Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35646551›Full record

ReviewJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research

Static vs. dynamic navigation for endodontic microsurgery - A comparative review.

Geo T D, Payal Saxena, Saurabh Gupta

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Expert consensus on apical microsurgery.International journal of oral science · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Geo T DDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government College of Dentistry, 1 Sardar Patel Marg, Opp. M.Y. Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, 452001, India.
Payal SaxenaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government College of Dentistry, 1 Sardar Patel Marg, Opp. M.Y. Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, 452001, India.
Saurabh GuptaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government College of Dentistry, 1 Sardar Patel Marg, Opp. M.Y. Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, 452001, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digitalization of operative procedures through three-dimensional (3D) navigation is a remarkable advancement in the field of dentistry which allows both precision and accuracy while treating patients. It is an emerging technology with a wide variety of applications in dentistry. In the field of endodontics, these computer-aided 3D systems are being used for accessing and localizing canals in calcified teeth, removal of fiberglass posts, and in peri-apical surgeries etc. Preservation of important anatomical structures becomes necessary while performing root-end resection or peri-apical surgeries. However, it is clinically difficult to achieve accurate root-end resection due to the limited field of view, inconvenient perspective, and interferential bleeding among other factors. 3D guided endodontics play vital role here. 3D guided endodontics can be achieved in two ways- Static and Dynamic navigation. Due to availability of limited literature, there is a need to review new evidence comparing the effectiveness of both techniques of 3D guided endodontic navigation systems. This review paper describes the comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of static as well as dynamic navigation in the field of endodontic microsurgery.

Indexed as

3D printingDynamic navigationEndodontic microsurgeryStatic guidanceTargeted endodontics

Identifiers

PMID35646551
PMCPMC9136095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.