Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35646530›Full record

ArticleActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B2022

Aristolochic acids exposure was not the main cause of liver tumorigenesis in adulthood.

Shuzhen Chen, Yaping Dong, Xinming Qi, Qiqi Cao, Tao Luo, Zhaofang Bai, Huisi He, Zhecai Fan, Lingyan Xu, Guozhen Xing and 12 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Shuzhen ChenNational Center for Liver Cancer, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Yaping DongNational Center for Liver Cancer, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Xinming QiCenter for Drug Safety Evaluation and Research, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.
Qiqi CaoNational Center for Liver Cancer, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Tao LuoInstitute of Pathology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China.
Zhaofang BaiChina Military Institute of Chinese Materia, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China.
Huisi HeNational Center for Liver Cancer, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Zhecai FanNational Center for Liver Cancer, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Lingyan XuNational Center for Liver Cancer, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Guozhen XingCenter for Drug Safety Evaluation and Research, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.
Chunyu WangChina Military Institute of Chinese Materia, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China.
Zhichao JinDepartment of Health Statistics, Faculty of Medical Service, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Zhixuan LiNational Center for Liver Cancer, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Lei ChenNational Center for Liver Cancer, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Yishan ZhongNational Center for Liver Cancer, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Jiao WangInstitute of Pathology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China.
Jia GeInstitute of Pathology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China.
Xiaohe XiaoChina Military Institute of Chinese Materia, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China.
Xiuwu BianInstitute of Pathology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China.
Wen WenNational Center for Liver Cancer, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Jin RenCenter for Drug Safety Evaluation and Research, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.
Hongyang WangNational Center for Liver Cancer, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital · CNSecond Military Medical University · CNArmy Medical University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNSouthwest Hospital · CNChinese People's Liberation Army · CNShanghai Institute of Materia Medica · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aristolochic acids (AAs) have long been considered as a potent carcinogen due to its nephrotoxicity. Aristolochic acid I (AAI) reacts with DNA to form covalent aristolactam (AL)-DNA adducts, leading to subsequent A to T transversion mutation, commonly referred as AA mutational signature. Previous research inferred that AAs were widely implicated in liver cancer throughout Asia. In this study, we explored whether AAs exposure was the main cause of liver cancer in the context of HBV infection in mainland China. Totally 1256 liver cancer samples were randomly retrieved from 3 medical centers and a refined bioanalytical method was used to detect AAI-DNA adducts. 5.10% of these samples could be identified as AAI positive exposure. Whole genome sequencing suggested 8.41% of 107 liver cancer patients exhibited the dominant AA mutational signature, indicating a relatively low overall AAI exposure rate. In animal models, long-term administration of AAI barely increased liver tumorigenesis in adult mice, opposite from its tumor-inducing role when subjected to infant mice. Furthermore, AAI induced dose-dependent accumulation of AA-DNA adduct in target organs in adult mice, with the most detected in kidney instead of liver. Taken together, our data indicate that AA exposure was not the major threat of liver cancer in adulthood.

Indexed as

AA–DNA adductAAI, Aristolochic acid IAAs, aristolochic acidsAFP, alpha fetoproteinAL, aristolactamALT, alanine aminotransferaseAristolochic acids (AAs)AST, aspartate aminotransferaseCHERRY, Chinese Electronic Health Records ResearchCOSMIC, Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in CancerCRE, creatininedA-ALI, 7-deoxyadenosin-N6-yl aristolactam IDEN, N-nitrosodiethylamineEHBH, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery HospitalFFPE, formalin-fixed paraffin-embeddedHBV, hepatitis B virusHCC, hepatocellular carcinomaHepatitis B virus (HBV)Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)Liver tumorigenesisMutational signatureMVI, microvessel invasionRisk factorsSNV, somatic single nucleotide variantTCGA, The Cancer Genome AtlasTumor preventionWGS, whole genome sequencingWT, wild type

Identifiers

PMID35646530
PMCPMC9136577
OpenAlexW3213262051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.