Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35646366›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2022

Advanced cancer patients in a randomized clinical trial of night-simulating eyeglasses observed to have a normal 24-h circadian rhythm during chemotherapy.

Keith I Block, Charlotte Gyllenhaal, James F Grutsch, Penny B Block, Thomas Kazlausky, David Blask, Edward Carome, Justin Reynolds, Dinah Faith Q Huff, William Hrushesky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Keith I BlockBlock Center for Integrative Cancer Treatment, Skokie, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9462-2879
Charlotte GyllenhaalBlock Center for Integrative Cancer Treatment, Skokie, IL, USA.
James F GrutschRhythmalytics, LLC, Columbia, SC, USA.
Penny B BlockBlock Center for Integrative Cancer Treatment, Skokie, IL, USA.
Thomas KazlauskyAmbulatory Monitoring, Inc., Ardsley, NY, USA.
David BlaskTulane Cancer Center and Louisiana Cancer Research Consortium, Tulane Center for Circadian Biology, Department of Structural and Cellular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Edward CaromeLighting Innovations, LLC, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Justin ReynoldsWm. Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Medical Center, Columbia, SC, USA.
Dinah Faith Q HuffCollege of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
William HrusheskyRhythmalytics, LLC, Columbia, SC, USA.
Heart Rhythm Society · USAmbulatory Monitoring (United States) · USBlock Center · USIllinois College · USLighting Innovation (United States) · USTulane University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of South Carolina · USWm. Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Cancer patients routinely exhibit dysfunctional circadian organization. Indeed, a dysfunctional circadian organization is a hallmark of advanced cancer. A cohort of advanced cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy was recruited to investigate whether manipulating exposure to blue light could restore or ameliorate their circadian organization. Methods: Thirty advanced metastatic cancer patients participated in a randomized crossover trial to evaluate whether blue light-blocking night-simulating eyeglasses could ameliorate a disrupted circadian organization better than sham eyeglasses. Circadian organization was evaluated by actigraphy and patients' self-reports of sleep, fatigue, and quality of life. Kruskal-Wallis tests compared patients' outcomes in circadian organization with a cohort of non-cancer, disease-free individuals with normal sleep as a negative control, and with advanced cancer patients with disrupted circadian organization as a positive control. Quality-of-life outcomes of the patients were compared with population-based controls (negative controls) and with cohorts of advanced cancer patients (positive controls). Results: Actigraphy measurements, self-reported sleep, fatigue levels, and quality-of-life outcomes of trial participants were similar to those of negative controls with a normal circadian organization, in spite of the trial patients' concurrent chemotherapy. Night-simulating glasses did not improve circadian organization. The 24-h correlation of day-to-day rhythms of rest and activity was 0.455 for the experimental eyeglasses and 0.476 for the sham eyeglasses ( Conclusion: The circadian organization of patients in this study unexpectedly resembled that of healthy controls and was better than comparison populations with disrupted circadian organization. The study clinic implements chronomodulated chemotherapy and a systematic, supportive integrative treatment protocol. Results suggest a need for further research on interventions for circadian rhythm. Although the study intervention did not benefit the participants, this work highlights the value of supporting circadian time structure in advanced cancer patients.

Indexed as

cancerchronomodulated chemotherapyCircadian organizationcircadian rhythmsfatigueintegrative therapiesquality of lifesleep

Identifiers

PMID35646366
PMCPMC9134428
OpenAlexW4285183010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.