Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35646344›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pain2022

"Prevalence of chronic pain following resection of pelvic bone tumours: A single centre prospective observational survey".

Sumitra Bakshi, Meenal Rana, Ashish Gulia, Ajay Puri, Tadala Ss Harsha, Shashank Tiwari, Aparna Gotur

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pain, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sumitra BakshiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Meenal RanaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5983-4163
Ashish GuliaBone and Soft Tissue Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institure (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Ajay PuriBone and Soft Tissue Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institure (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Tadala Ss HarshaBone and Soft Tissue Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institure (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Shashank TiwariDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Institute of Medical Sciences, BHU, Varanasi, India.
Aparna GoturDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INCare Institute of Medical Sciences · INGlenfield Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hemipelvectomy is a major surgery most often performed for pelvic malignancy. These complex surgeries often involve dissection around major neurovascular bundle and resection of tumour being bone along with involved tissues. This may result in short and long term morbidities. There is very little literature about incidence of chronic pain after pelvic resections. We conducted a prospective study at a tertiary cancer hospital to assess the prevalence of chronic pain post hemipelvectomy. Method: This is a single centre prospective observational study conducted over 30 months. Pain scores were recorded using Brief pain inventory (BPI) and pain detect questionnaire. The quality of life was assessed using musculoskeletal tumour society (MSTS) score. Intra-operative details like extent of surgical resection, nerves spared, details of intra-operative and post-operative analgesia were retrieved from the patient files. Data were analysed using SPSS 21 version. Results: Neuropathic pain post hemipelvectomy was uncommon. The prevalence of mild to moderate somatic pain was around 30%. Functional limitation was minimal as assessed by BPI and MSTS score. A high incidence of numbness was seen to persist in and around the area of surgical incision (50%). Conclusion: This is first study to report the incidence of chronic pain post hemipelvectomy done for pelvic tumour resections. Despite the extensive nature of resection involved, there is a low prevalence of neuropathic pain in this population. However, incidence of persistent somatic pain is high and there is a need for further studies for evaluating the causality.

Indexed as

chronic painpainpelvic resectionpelvic tumourprevalence

Identifiers

PMID35646344
PMCPMC9136992
OpenAlexW3204536675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.