Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35646319›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Mitogenomes provide new insights of evolutionary history of Boreheptagyiini and Diamesini (Diptera: Chironomidae: Diamesinae).

Xiao-Long Lin, Zheng Liu, Li-Ping Yan, Xin Duan, Wen-Jun Bu, Xin-Hua Wang, Chen-Guang Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. First report of the complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. First report of the complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiao-Long LinCollege of Life Sciences Nankai University Tianjin China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6544-6204
Zheng LiuGeological Museum of China Beijing China.
Li-Ping YanSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation Beijing Forestry University Beijing China.
Xin DuanDepartment of Plant Protection College of Horticulture and Landscape Tianjin Agricultural University Tianjin China.
Wen-Jun BuCollege of Life Sciences Nankai University Tianjin China.
Xin-Hua WangCollege of Life Sciences Nankai University Tianjin China.
Chen-Guang ZhengCollege of Life Sciences Nankai University Tianjin China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0484-6153

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitogenomes have been widely used for phylogenetic reconstruction of various Dipteran groups, but specifically for chironomid, they have not been carried out to resolve the relationships. Diamesinae (Diptera: Chironomidae) are important bioindicators for freshwater ecosystem monitoring, but its evolutionary history remains uncertain for lack of information. Here, coupled with one previously published and 30 new mitogenomes of Diamesinae, we carried out comparative mitogenomic analysis and phylogenetic analysis. Mitogenomes of Diamesinae were conserved in structure, and all genes arranged in the same order as the ancestral insect mitogenome. All protein-coding genes in Diamesinae were under stronger purifying selection than those of other nonbiting midge species, which may exhibit signs of adaptation to life at cold living conditions. Phylogenetic analyses strongly supported the monophyly of Diamesinae, with Boreheptagyiini deeply nested within Diamesini. In addition, phylogenetic relationship of selected six genera was resolved, except

Indexed as

Diamesinaemitogenomephylogeny

Identifiers

PMID35646319
PMCPMC9130564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.