Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35646295›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2022

You can't do anything about it, but you can make the best of it: a qualitative analysis of pandemic-related experiences in six European countries.

Irina Zrnić Novaković, Brigitte Lueger-Schuster, Lucia Verginer, Helena Bakić, Dean Ajduković, Camila Borges, Margarida Figueiredo-Braga, Jana Darejan Javakhishvili, Lela Tsiskarishvili, Małgorzata Dragan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Irina Zrnić NovakovićDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8583-7234
Brigitte Lueger-SchusterDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0784-8437
Lucia VerginerDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Helena BakićDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-0726-8267
Dean AjdukovićVienna Doctoral School in Cognition, Behavior and Neuroscience, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9223-360X
Camila BorgesTrauma Observatory, Centre for Social Studies (CES) of the University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Margarida Figueiredo-BragaTrauma Observatory, Centre for Social Studies (CES) of the University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2374-4371
Jana Darejan JavakhishviliInstitute of Addiction Studies, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Lela TsiskarishviliFaculty of Arts and Science, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Małgorzata DraganFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8221-2012
Nadia NagórkaFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Xenia Anastassiou-HadjicharalambousPsychology Program, School of Ηumanities, Social Sciences and Law, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-3993-8229
Chrysanthi LioupiPsychology Program, School of Ηumanities, Social Sciences and Law, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Annett LotzinDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2834-8047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The complex system of stressors related to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected the global population, provoking a broad range of psychological reactions. Although numerous studies have investigated the mental health impact of COVID-19, qualitative research and cross-country comparisons are still rare. Objective: This qualitative study aimed to explore self-perceived challenges and opportunities related to COVID-19 across six European countries. The overall objective was to provide a differentiated picture of individual subjective experiences in the early stages of the pandemic. Method: The present study included 7309 participants from Austria, Croatia, Georgia, Greece, Poland, and Portugal. We performed qualitative content analysis according to Mayring analyse open-ended questions regarding stressful events, positive and negative aspects of the pandemic, and recommendations to cope with the pandemic situation. Results: Participants' accounts were moderately consistent across the countries. The most prominent themes regarding stressful and negative pandemic aspects included: Conclusions: Participants experienced various challenges, but also shared several positive pandemic consequences and recommendations to cope with the pandemic. These first-hand data could inform mental health practices to promote well-being during COVID-19 and similar global challenges in the participating countries and possibly beyond. HIGHLIGHTS: We examined COVID-19-related experiences in 7309 adults from six European countries.Besides challenges, participants identified many positive pandemic consequences.Participants' recommendations to cope with COVID-19 included behavioural and cognitive-emotional strategies.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultEuropeHumansQualitative ResearchcopingcoronavirusCOVID-19cross-country studymental healthpandemicpositive aspectsqualitative content analysis

Identifiers

PMID35646295
PMCPMC9132427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.