ArticleKansas journal of medicine2022
Perceived Barriers to Pediatric Clinical Trials Implementation: A Survey of Health Care Staff.
Article in Kansas journal of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of clinical research networks in rural America: Our experience from the Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines-1 trialau.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- The urgent need for conducting clinical trials in pediatric nephrology globally.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical trials are the gold standard for assessing the effectiveness and safety of treatments. The objective of this study was to assess provider opinions regarding implementing pediatric clinical trials in various practice settings across Kansas. Methods: The study was completed within the Sunflower Pediatric Clinical Trials Research Extension (SPeCTRE), an affiliate of the IDeA States Pediatric Clinical Trials Network (ISPCTN). A cross-sectional, 36-item survey was administered to a state-wide convenience sample targeting health care providers and clinic staff. Results: A total of 115 health care providers and clinic staff completed surveys; 31% were physicians. Physicians were more likely than other clinic staff to have experience with clinical trials (correlation coefficient [CC] = 0.270, p = 0.004). When compared to urban respondents, rural providers were less supportive of recruitment for clinical trials in their practices (CC = -0.251, p = 0.008) and more likely to feel comfortable referring patients for clinical trials involving treatments that their insurance did not cover (CC = 0.302, p = 0.001). Conclusions: A range of rural and urban health care professionals supported conducting pediatric clinical trials but identified several barriers as well. These results will support future pediatric clinical trials across the country including Kansas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.