Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35646240›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of telerehabilitation2021

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Real-Time Telerehabilitation Intervention for Children and Young Adults with Acquired Brain Injury During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Experience Report.

Maria Chiara Oprandi, Alessandra Bardoni, Luisa Corno, Agata Marchetti Guerrini, Luigi Molatore, Luisella Negri, Elena Beretta, Federica Locatelli, Sandra Strazzer, Geraldina Poggi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of telerehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Chiara OprandiScientific Institute, Irccs E. Medea, Neuro-Oncological and Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Unit, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
Alessandra BardoniScientific Institute, Irccs E. Medea, Neuro-Oncological and Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Unit, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
Luisa CornoScientific Institute, Irccs E. Medea, Neuro-Oncological and Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Unit, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
Agata Marchetti GuerriniScientific Institute, Irccs E. Medea, Neuro-Oncological and Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Unit, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
Luigi MolatoreScientific Institute, Irccs E. Medea, Neuro-Oncological and Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Unit, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
Luisella NegriScientific Institute, Irccs E. Medea, Neuro-Oncological and Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Unit, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
Elena BerettaScientific Institute, Irccs E. Medea, Acquired Brain Injury Unit, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
Federica LocatelliScientific Institute, Irccs E. Medea, Acquired Brain Injury Unit, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
Sandra StrazzerScientific Institute, Irccs E. Medea, Acquired Brain Injury Unit, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
Geraldina PoggiScientific Institute, Irccs E. Medea, Neuro-Oncological and Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Unit, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
IRCCS Eugenio Medea · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of a telerehabilitation intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic in a sample of children and young adults with Acquired Brain Injury (ABI). Thirteen patients and/or their families agreed to participate in the speech and neuropsychological telerehabilitation sessions. The treatment was synchronous, patient centered and aimed at improving specific abilities. Sessions were held twice a week over a 10-week period. Two questionnaires were completed both by parents and therapists to assess feasibility and acceptability. Neither technical issues nor clinical obstacles were found. The quality of the therapeutic relationship played a key role in the intervention. Synchronous telerehabilitation provided several advantages both for patients and therapists. Moreover, the patient centered intervention eased the burden of the caregivers at a time of high stress. The real-time telerehabilitation treatments were deemed suitable for children and young adults with ABI. Further studies are needed to support the use of telerehabilitation as an integral part of their standard care.

Indexed as

AcceptabilityAcquired brain injuryDevelopmental ageFeasibilityNeuropsychologyReal-timeSpeech therapyTelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID35646240
PMCPMC9098128
OpenAlexW4200346993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.