Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35646196›Full record

ArticleClinical simulation in nursing2022

Comparison of Augmented Reality-assisted and Instructor-assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Simulated Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

Luoya Hou, Xu Dong, Ke Li, Congying Yang, Yang Yu, Xiaoyan Jin, Shaomei Shang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical simulation in nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luoya HouDepartment of Geriatric Nursing and Rehabilitation, Peking University School of Nursing, #38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.
Xu DongDepartment of Geriatric Nursing and Rehabilitation, Peking University School of Nursing, #38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.
Ke LiDepartment of Geriatric Nursing and Rehabilitation, Peking University School of Nursing, #38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.
Congying YangDepartment of Geriatric Nursing and Rehabilitation, Peking University School of Nursing, #38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.
Yang YuDepartment of technology, Chengdu Techman Software Co., Ltd, #888 Chenglong Road, Longquanyi District, Chengdu 610199, China.
Xiaoyan JinDepartment of Geriatric Nursing and Rehabilitation, Peking University School of Nursing, #38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.
Shaomei ShangDepartment of Geriatric Nursing and Rehabilitation, Peking University School of Nursing, #38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A trained lay rescuer is the most important determinant of survival from sudden cardiac arrest. Augmented Reality (AR) device may represent a powerful instrument for CPR assistance and self-training especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A prospective, parallel, 1:1 pilot randomized clinical trial was designed. An AR CPR app was developed and 28 participants were randomly allocated into AR-assisted group and instructor-assisted group. Acceptability, usability, and mean per minute/per cycle chest compression depth, rate and accuracy were measured. Results: The mean scores for acceptability and usability were all rated good in each group. Comparing real-time AR-assisted CPR to instructor-assisted CPR, the mean difference of compression depth was 0.18 (95% CI: -0.18-0.53) cm and rate was -1.58 (95% CI: -6.11-2.95) min-1. Comparing AR self-training to instructor training, the AR group was not significantly different between two groups regarding both compression depth, rate and accuracy ( Conclusion: We found that the AR CPR app was an acceptable and usable tool both in real-time-assisted CPR and self-training CPR.

Indexed as

Augment Reality (AR)Bystander CPRCardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)CPR trainingNursing education

Identifiers

PMID35646196
PMCPMC9126500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.