Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35646143›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

The Effect and Safety of Thunder-Fire Moxibustion for Low Back Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Yao Yao, Lin Zhou, Feng-Qin Chen, Rui Zhang, Xiang-Tian Pang, Yu-Fei Leng, Xiao Xu, Zhi-Ling Sun

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yao YaoSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-9461
Lin ZhouSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9140-5094
Feng-Qin ChenOffice of Academic Affairs, Nanjing Normal University of Special Education, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210038, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9794-7107
Rui ZhangSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5691-8329
Xiang-Tian PangSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0171-2571
Yu-Fei LengAuxiliary Teaching Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8316-127X
Xiao XuSchool of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310053, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9272-6236
Zhi-Ling SunSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-4802
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNNanjing Normal University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNZhejiang Chinese Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is considered the leading cause of people living with years of disability worldwide. Notably, thunder-fire moxibustion (TFM) is a new type of moxibustion, which has been widely applied to treat pain syndromes for thousands of years. This study aims to provide evidence to evaluate the effect and safety of TFM in treating LBP. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, EBSCO, CNKI, Wanfang Data, CBM, and VIP (until April 2021) was used to identify studies reporting pain intensity, disability, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and quality of life in patients with LBP. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which compared TFM and other therapies in LBP, were included. Meanwhile, methodological quality was evaluated using the Cochrane criteria for risk of bias, and the level of evidence was rated utilizing the GRADE approach. Results: Twenty-one RCTs, including 2198 patients, satisfied the inclusion criteria. Compared with other therapies, the effect of TFM was statistically significant, pain intensity decreased (SMD = 0.94; 95% CI (0.74, 1.14); Conclusions: Based on the existing evidence, it can be concluded that TFM may have a better effect than other treatments on LBP. However, it is not yet possible to assess the safety level of TFM therapy. Due to the universal low quality of the eligible trials and low evidence level, rigorously designed large-scale RCTs must be conducted in order to further confirm the results in this review.

Identifiers

PMID35646143
PMCPMC9132655
OpenAlexW4280598881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.