ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
The Clinical Features and Long-Term Follow-Up of Vitamin B6-Responsive Infantile Spasms in a Chinese Cohort.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the clinical features, treatment, and prognosis of patients with vitamin B6-responsive infantile spasms (IS). Methods: The clinical features, genetics, and follow-up data of 30 patients were collected and analyzed. Results: The age of epileptic spasms (ES) onset was from 3 months to 12 months. They all received high doses of vitamin B6 at different times after the onset of ES, ranging from 1 day to 5 months. ES were controlled within 11 days in 93% (28/30) patients, and as late as 1 month and 2 months in the other two patients. In the course of treatment, 28 patients were seizure-free all the time, and seizures of other two patients recurred due to withdrawal of vitamin B6. The available follow-up EEG results of 28 patients were normal in 26 cases, and 81% (21/26) had suppressed epileptic discharges within 6 months. Of the 26 cases with normal follow up EEG, 4 had developmental delay and 22 had normal development. The time for EEG to return to normal in 22 patients with normal development ranged from 14 days to 2 years (mean = 111.5 days; median = 52.5 days). The time for EEG to return to normal in the other 4 patients with development delay ranged from 4 months to 2 years (mean = 375 days; median = 330 days). To the last follow-up, seizures were controlled well in 29 surviving patients, and 21 patients were able to deactivate from all medications without seizures recurrence. Sixteen patients showed varying degrees of developmental delay after onset. After seizure control, the psychomotor development was delayed in 7 patients (one died) until the last follow-up. Genetic analysis did not show any meaningful results. Conclusion: An observation period of 1-2 weeks is essential to identify patients with vitamin B6-responsive IS. The treatment time could be extended according to the treatment response and EEG changes. It might take a longer time for EEG to return to normal and to stop taking drugs in patients with persistent or unimproved developmental delay. Neurodevelopmental outcomes and prognosis of vitamin B6-responsive IS were relatively favorable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.