ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
An Integrated Model Combining Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms for Classification of Rupture Status of IAs.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance comparison and future perspectives of deep learning and classical machine learning in bone tumor applications: a systematic review (2019-2025).BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- The roles of radiomics and deep learning for automatic detection, stability assessment, and rupture risk prediction in intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Prediction of cerebral aneurysm rupture risk by machine learning algorithms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,670 participants.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Intracranial Aneurysm Management.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingPooled it
- Graph and Geometric Deep Learning for Intracranial Aneurysm Geometry and Hemodynamics: A Systematic Review with Implications for Neurovascular Implant Design and Evaluation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cerebrovascular Imaging: A Targeted Review of Aneurysm Detection and Rupture Risk Prediction.JMA journal · 2026Review
- Computational Fluid Dynamics Approaches for Analyzing Rupture and Growth of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Hemodynamic analysis of thrombosed intracranial aneurysms: a comparative correlation study.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Investigating the role of blood models in predicting rupture status of intracranial aneurysms.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2025Article
- Impact Exploration of Spatiotemporal Feature Derivation and Selection on Machine Learning-Based Predictive Models for Post-Embolization Cerebral Aneurysm Recanalization.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2024Article
- Integrating PointNet-Based Model and Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of Rupture Status of IAs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Assessment of intracranial aneurysm rupture risk using a point cloud-based deep learning model.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Advances in research and application of artificial intelligence and radiomic predictive models based on intracranial aneurysm images.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
- Prediction and analysis of periprocedural complications associated with endovascular treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms using machine learning.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rupture risk assessment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is clinically relevant. How to accurately assess the rupture risk of IAs remains a challenge in clinical decision-making. Purpose: We aim to build an integrated model to improve the assessment of the rupture risk of IAs. Materials and Methods: A total of 148 (39 ruptured and 109 unruptured) IA subjects were retrospectively computed with computational fluid dynamics (CFDs), and the integrated models were proposed by combining machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms. ML algorithms that include random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), XGBoost (XGB), support vector machine (SVM), and LightGBM were, respectively, adopted to classify ruptured and unruptured IAs. A Pointnet DL algorithm was applied to extract hemodynamic cloud features from the hemodynamic clouds obtained from CFD. Morphological variables and hemodynamic parameters along with the extracted hemodynamic cloud features were acted as the inputs to the classification models. The classification results with and without hemodynamic cloud features are computed and compared. Results: Without consideration of hemodynamic cloud features, the classification accuracy of RF, KNN, XGB, SVM, and LightGBM was 0.824, 0.759, 0.839, 0.860, and 0.829, respectively, and the AUCs of them were 0.897, 0.584, 0.892, 0.925, and 0.890, respectively. With the consideration of hemodynamic cloud features, the accuracy successively increased to 0.908, 0.873, 0.900, 0.926, and 0.917. Meanwhile, the AUCs reached 0.952, 0.881, 0.950, 0.969, and 0.965 eventually. Adding consideration of hemodynamic cloud features, the SVM could perform best with the highest accuracy of 0.926 and AUC of 0.969, respectively. Conclusion: The integrated model combining ML and DL algorithms could improve the classification of IAs. Adding consideration of hemodynamic cloud features could bring more accurate classification, and hemodynamic cloud features were important for the discrimination of ruptured IAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.