Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35645758›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2022

Safety and Feasibility of a Novel Exoskeleton for Locomotor Rehabilitation of Subjects With Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective, Multi-Center, and Cross-Over Clinical Trial.

Sijing Chen, Zhanbin Wang, Yongqiang Li, Jiashuai Tang, Xue Wang, Liping Huang, Zhuangwei Fang, Tao Xu, Jiang Xu, Feng Guo and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sijing ChenCenter of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Zhanbin WangSchool of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Yongqiang LiCenter of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jiashuai TangJiangsu Zhongshan Geriatric Rehabilitation Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Xue WangCenter of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Liping HuangDepartment of Rehabilitation, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhuangwei FangDepartment of Rehabilitation, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tao XuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jiang XuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Feng GuoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yizhao WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jianjun LongDepartment of Rehabilitation, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaodong WangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Fang LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Jianfeng LuoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yulong WangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaolin HuangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zishan JiaDepartment of Rehabilitation, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Mei ShuaiSchool of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Jianan LiCenter of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Shenzhen University · CNTongji Hospital · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CNBeihang University · CNYangPu Geriatric Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety, walking efficiency, physiological cost, don and doff time cost, and user satisfaction of Ai-robot. Design: Prospective, multi-center, and cross-over trial. Subjects: Paraplegic subjects ( Methods: Subjects who could walk independently using Aiwalker, Ailegs, and hip knee ankle foot orthosis (HKAFO) for 6 min within 30 days of training underwent 10 sets of tests. In each set, they completed three 6-min walk test (6MWT) sessions using the three aids in random order. Results: Skin lesions, pressure sores, and fractures, were the main adverse events, likely due to a lack of experience in using exoskeleton systems. The average 6MWT distances of the Aiwalker, Ailegs, and HKAFO groups were 134.20 ± 18.74, 79.71 ± 18.06, and 48.31 ± 19.87 m, respectively. The average heart rate increases in the Aiwalker (4.21 ± 8.20%) and Ailegs (41.81 ± 23.47%) groups were both significantly lower than that in the HKAFO group (62.33 ± 28.32%) (both Conclusion: Subjects with paraplegia below T6 level were able to ambulate safely and efficiently with Ai-robot. The use of Ai-robot should be learned under the guidance of experienced medical personnel.

Indexed as

exoskeletonorthosisparaplegiarehabilitationspinal cord injury (SCI)walking aid

Identifiers

PMID35645758
PMCPMC9133609
OpenAlexW4280553620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.