ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2022
Mitigating Computer Limitations in Replicating Numerical Simulations of a Neural Network Model With Hodgkin-Huxley-Type Neurons.
Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population bursts in a modular neural network as a mechanism for synchronized activity in KNDy neurons.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- On the Analyses of Medical Images Using Traditional Machine Learning Techniques and Convolutional Neural Networks.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational experiments have been very important to numerically simulate real phenomena in several areas. Many studies in computational biology discuss the necessity to obtain numerical replicability to accomplish new investigations. However, even following well-established rules in the literature, numerical replicability is unsuccessful when it takes the computer's limitations for representing real numbers into consideration. In this study, we used a previous published recurrent network model composed by Hodgkin-Huxley-type neurons to simulate the neural activity during development. The original source code in C/C++ was carefully refactored to mitigate the lack of replicability; moreover, it was re-implemented to other programming languages/software (XPP/XPPAUT, Python and Matlab) and executed under two operating systems (Windows and Linux). The commutation and association of the input current values during the summation of the pre-synaptic activity were also analyzed. A total of 72 simulations which must obtain the same result were executed to cover these scenarios. The results were replicated when the high floating-point precision (supplied by third-party libraries) was used. However, using the default floating-point precision type, none of the results were replicated when compared with previous results. Several new procedures were proposed during the source code refactorization; they allowed replicating only a few scenarios, regardless of the language and operating system. Thus, the generated computational "errors" were the same. Even using a simple computational model, the numerical replicability was very difficult to be achieved, requiring people with computational expertise to be performed. After all, the research community must be aware that conducting analyses with numerical simulations that use real number operations can lead to different conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.