Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35645725›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

The Effect of Bangerter Filters on Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity With External Noise.

Pan Zhang, Hanlin Wang, Weicong Ren, Huanhuan Guo, Jiayi Yang, Jiayu Tao, Zhijie Yang, Ying Li, Lijun Chen, Yajing Zhang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pan ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Hanlin WangDepartment of Psychology, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Weicong RenDepartment of Psychology, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Huanhuan GuoDepartment of Psychology, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Jiayi YangDepartment of Psychology, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Jiayu TaoDepartment of Psychology, Chengde Medical University, Chengde, China.
Zhijie YangDepartment of Psychology, Chengde Medical University, Chengde, China.
Ying LiDepartment of Psychiatry, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
Lijun ChenDepartment of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China.
Yajing ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Di WuDepartment of Medical Psychology, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is critical to address the relationship between density label of Bangerter filters and expected visual acuity, and how filters modulate contrast sensitivity (CS) at different spatial frequency and external noise levels. In the current study, the monocular visual acuity and CS at ten spatial frequencies and three noise levels were measured in normal subjects wearing no filters, 0.8, 0.4, or 0.2 Bangerter filters. Compared with the baseline condition (no filter worn), Bangerter filters degraded both visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function (CSF) in zero-noise conditions, but the reduction of both visual functions did not correlate with each other at any filter level. In addition, the stronger the filter was, the worse both visual functions became. In contrast, when external noise was present, filters improved the contrast sensitivity at low frequencies but deteriorated it at intermediate and high spatial frequencies. The perceptual template model was used to reveal the corresponding mechanism accounted for filter-induced visual function changes. Although the internal process in visual system should not be affected by the filters, the measurement of parameters was biased. To be specific, (1) the internal additive noise was elevated at all frequencies; (2) the perceptual template was improved at low spatial frequencies but impaired at intermediate spatial frequencies; and (3) the changes in both factors were highly dependent on filter intensity. We conclude that Bangerter filters influence visual acuity and contrast sensitivity differently and that their effect on contrast sensitivity depends on spatial frequency and noise.

Indexed as

Bangerter filtercontrast sensitivityexternal noiseperceptual templatevisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID35645725
PMCPMC9136063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.