ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Own Race Eye-Gaze Bias for All Emotional Faces but Accuracy Bias Only for Sad Expressions.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral Administration of Oxytocin, Like Intranasal Administration, Decreases Top-Down Social Attention.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2022Trial
- Positive affect increases aperiodic brain activity.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Neural signals gradually shift towards inferior frontal gyrus and long-term effects following facial imitation-based social learning.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
- The impact of stimulus format and presentation order on social working memory updating.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024Article
- Emotion-gaze interaction affects time-to-collision estimates, but not preferred interpersonal distance towards looming faces.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Recognition of facial emotion based on SOAR model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Detecting five-pattern personality traits using eye movement features for observing emotional faces.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Own race faces tend to be recognized more accurately than those of other less familiar races, however, findings to date have been inconclusive. The present study aimed to determine whether Chinese exhibit different recognition accuracy and eye gaze patterns for Asian (own-race) and White (other-race) facial expressions (neutral, happiness, sadness, anger, disgust, fear). A total of 89 healthy Chinese adults viewed Asian and White facial expressions while undergoing eye-tracking and were subsequently required to identify expressions and rate their intensity and effect on arousal. Results revealed that subjects recognized sad expressions in Asian faces better than in White ones. On the other hand, recognition accuracy was higher for White neutral, happy, fearful, and disgusted expressions although this may have been due to subjects more often misclassifying these Asian expressions as sadness. Moreover, subjects viewed the eyes of emotional expressions longer in Asian compared to White faces and the nose of sad ones, especially during the late phase of presentation, whereas pupil sizes, indicative of cognitive load and arousal, were smaller. Eye-gaze patterns were not, however, associated with recognition accuracy. Overall, findings demonstrate an own-race bias in Chinese for identifying sad expressions and more generally across emotional expressions in terms of viewing the eye region of emotional faces for longer and with reduced pupil size. Interestingly, subjects were significantly more likely to miss-identify Asian faces as sad resulting in an apparent other-race bias for recognizing neutral, happy, fearful, and disgusted expressions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.