ArticleEJIFCC2022
Evaluation of Dual Marker Approach Using Heart-Type Fatty Acid Binding Protein and High Sensitivity Troponin-I as an Alternative to Serial Sampling for Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Article in EJIFCC, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel cardiac biomarkers and multiple-marker approach in the early detection, prognosis, and risk stratification of cardiac diseases.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- The Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on the Lipid Profile and Cardiovascular Markers Following Downhill Running in Long-Distance Runners.Journal of human kinetics · 2023Article
- Hsp72-Based Effect and Mechanism of Microwave Radiation-Induced Cardiac Injury in Rats.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: An early rule in (high specificity and high PPV) and early rule out (high sensitivity and high NPV) is essential for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) to provide better utilization of resources, cost-effectiveness, and to reduce mortality. Methods: Consecutive chest pain patients (n=80) with symptoms indicative of coronary artery disease reported to the emergency room within 6 hours after onset of symptoms. An alternate Dual Marker Approach (DMA; both Heart-type Fatty Acid Binding Protein (H-FABP) and High sensitive Troponin-I (hsTnI) at 0 h) was compared to the Double Sampling approach (DSA; hsTnI at 0 h and 3 h (ESC guidelines)). Results: If both biomarkers were increased (n=17; 77.5%: 11 STEMI and 6 NSTEMI) above their respective cut-off value (HFABP 6.3 ng/mL and hsTnI 20.24 ng/L) at presentation, AMI ensued (100% PPV). Also, if both the markers were below their respective cut-offs at presentation, AMI was safely ruled out (n=41; with only 1 false negative). However, among the patients with either of these markers above their respective cut-off at presentation (n=22), DSA was required to find remaining AMI cases (n=4). Overall, DMA stands best for rule out (sensitivity 95.5%, NPV 97.6%) while DSA is superior for rule in (98.2% specificity, 95.2% PPV). Conclusion: With the use of the proposed DMA, 58/80 (72.5%) patients with acute chest pain were reliably ruled in/ruled out for AMI at the presentation itself, while the remaining patients still required serial monitoring (DSA) for confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35645696PMC9092720What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.