Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35645694›Full record

ArticleEJIFCC2022

Importance of Observing the Progress Curve During Enzyme Assay in an Automated Clinical Chemistry Analyzer: A Case Study.

Vivek Pant

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in EJIFCC, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vivek PantDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Samyak Diagnostic Pvt. Ltd, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the case presented here the reported result for total creatine phosphokinase led to the physician calling for report confirmation. The repeated test result was in keeping with the clinical picture and thus the previous erroneous result was amended. The incorrect result from auto analyzer was identified as failure to run the sample in dilution after instrumental flagging of possible substrate exhaustion evidenced by erroneous progress curve. A frequent reason for nonlinear progress curves is the presence of excess enzyme which can be easily misinterpreted as lower enzyme activity in a provided sample. Careful inspection of progress curve and predilution of sample in anticipated cases could avoid erroneous result.

Indexed as

enzymeprogress curvesample dilutionsubstrate exhaustion

Identifiers

PMID35645694
PMCPMC9092719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.