ReviewPostepy dermatologii i alergologii2022
The conjunctival allergen provocation test and the nasal allergen provocation test as specific alternatives to the oral food challenge.
Review in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Allergenicity Assessment of Plant-Derived Sweet Proteins-In Silico, In Vitro, In Vivo, and Clinical Approach: A Systematic Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Variability of Diagnostic Outcomes in Nasal Allergen Challenge: The Role of Combined Subjective and Objective Indicators.Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
- Allergen Testing: A Review of the Indications, Procedures, and Limitations in Ocular Allergy.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2024Review
- [Research progress and clinical application of allergen nasal provocation test].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Provocation tests with allergens play a critical role in differential diagnosis of allergic diseases. The nasal allergen provocation test and the conjunctival allergen provocation test are particularly useful in the diagnosis of allergies with the underlying mechanism involving IgE-dependent reactions. Interestingly, the symptoms typical of both the nasal allergen provocation test and conjunctival allergen provocation test occur during the tests: ocular symptoms during the nasal test and typical nasal symptoms during the conjunctival test. These symptoms provide a picture of the early and late phases of the allergic reaction. Increasing attention is given to the role of the two provocation tests in differential diagnosis of food allergies, and the first studies involving food challenge tests provide a solid foundation for further research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.