Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35645661›Full record

ReviewPostepy dermatologii i alergologii2022

Antimalarials - old drugs are new again.

Anna Woźniacka

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna WoźniackaDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Medical University of Lodz · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to discuss the therapeutic mechanism of action of antimalarials, in particular hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), in patients with lupus erythematosus. It examines the results of recent studies indicating the need to revise the indications, dosage and duration of safe therapy, thus limiting the possibility of adverse effects. Historically, HCQ was recommended for patients with arthritis as a predominant symptom, whereas today, it is recommended for all lupus patients, even those with lupus nephritis and pregnant women; it has a favourable therapeutic profile, particularly regarding its effect on the activity of the disease, and the possibility of prolonging survival time and preventing organ damage and dysfunction. Antimalarials are basic, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, which not only relieve the symptoms of inflammation, but also affect the underlying processes; therefore, they should be administered chronically, and the expected effects may sometimes take a long time to become apparent. In the past, the recommended dose was 6.5 mg/kg ideal body weight, whereas today it is up to 5.0 mg/kg real body weight. A very important aspect of long-term therapy is the strict adherence to the medical prescription; hence, the introduction of a new formulation containing 400 mg of hydroxychloroquine sulphate per tablet is an interesting proposal.

Indexed as

antimalarialschloroquinehydroxychloroquinelupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID35645661
PMCPMC9131958
OpenAlexW3191746084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.