Trial reportClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022
Evaluation of the EVO/EVO+ Sphere and Toric Visian ICL: Six Month Results from the United States Food and Drug Administration Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three Year Results from the United States FDA Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study of the EVO/EVO+ Implantable Collamer Lens.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Trial
- The EVO ICL for Moderate Myopia: Results from the US FDA Clinical Trial.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Trial
- AI-Assisted UBM versus Conventional Sizing Approaches for ICL Implantation: A Retrospective Analysis of Vault Outcomes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Influence of Refractive Error, Age, and Ophthalmic Anatomical Characteristics on Refractive Surgery Choices.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Research progress on postoperative higher-order aberrations after ICL implantation: patterns of change, influencing factors, and associated visual disturbances.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Real-World Safety Profile of EVO and EVO+ Implantable Collamer Lenses: A Retrospective Study Based on FDA Surveillance Data.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Clinical Applications of Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography in Managing Phakic and Secondary Intraocular Lens Implants: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes of posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in patients aged 46 years and above.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Visual outcomes with two posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses in myopic patients: a contralateral eye study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Objective Evaluation and Comparison of Diffractive versus Refractive Phakic Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Implantation of a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens on Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width, retinal nerve fiber layer, and macular thickness.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Implantable Collamer Lens Procedure Planning: A Review of Global Approaches.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Review
- A Comprehensive Retrospective Analysis of EVO/EVO+ Implantable Collamer Lens: Evaluating Refractive Outcomes in the Largest Single Center Study of ICL Patients in the United States.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Long-Term Vault Changes in Different Levels and Factors Affecting Vault Change After Implantation of Implantable Collamer Lens with a Central Hole.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Intraocular Implantable Collamer Lens with a Central Hole Implantation: Safety, Efficacy, and Patient Outcomes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Review
- Exploring Nomograms for Implantable Collamer Lens Size Selection in Myopia: A Literature-based Compilation.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Collamer posterior chamber phakic refractive lenses with a central port design (EVO and EVO+ Sphere and Toric Visian ICLs) for correction of moderate-to-high myopia with or without astigmatism. Patients and Methods: Six-month results of a multicenter clinical trial performed under United States FDA Investigational Device Exemption. Subjects 21 through 45 years of age with myopia ranging from -3.00 D to -20.00 D and astigmatism up to 4.00 D underwent implantation of EVO or EVO+ Sphere or Toric Visian ICLs. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, manifest refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell density, and adverse events were evaluated over 6 months. Results: This clinical trial enrolled 629 eyes of 327 subjects with mean age 35.6 ± 5.09 years. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) measured -7.62 ± 2.75 D (range: -3.00 to -15.62 D). At 6 months, mean SE was -0.079 ± 0.33 D, with 90.5% within ± 0.50 D of target and 98.9% within ±1.00 D of target. Mean postoperative UDVA and CDVA were -0.059 ± 0.10 logMAR and -0.13 ± 0.08 logMAR, respectively. 52.3% of eyes gained lines of CDVA. Efficacy and safety indices were 1.06 and 1.24, respectively. No eye experienced pupillary block, required peripheral iridotomy or iridectomy, developed anterior subcapsular cataract or had elevated IOP due to angle narrowing or pigment dispersion. Mean endothelial cell density declined by 2.3%. Conclusion: EVO ICL lenses demonstrated accuracy of refractive correction and achievement of high levels of UDVA. This clinical trial confirmed that the central port design of EVO and EVO+ Sphere and Toric Visian ICL lenses functions effectively to allow physiologic flow of aqueous humor, thus eliminating the requirement for preoperative peripheral iridotomies. The results of this clinical trial resulted in FDA approval on March 25, 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.