Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35645385›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2022

Effect of Inter-Reader Variability on Diffusion-Weighted MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements and Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response for Breast Cancer.

Nu N Le, Wen Li, Natsuko Onishi, David C Newitt, Jessica E Gibbs, Lisa J Wilmes, John Kornak, Savannah C Partridge, Barbara LeStage, Elissa R Price and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer management: current applications, limitations, and future directions.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Non-contrast Breast MR Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nu N LeDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Wen LiDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6584-363X
Natsuko OnishiDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4495-9187
David C NewittDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Jessica E GibbsDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1785-0899
Lisa J WilmesDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
John KornakDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Savannah C PartridgeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6370-9111
Barbara LeStageI-SPY 2 Advocacy Group, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Elissa R PriceDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Bonnie N JoeDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Laura J EssermanDepartment of Surgery and Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9202-4568
Nola M HyltonDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USChildren's Advocacy Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

The I SPY 2.2 TRIAL: Evolving to Imaging and Molecular Biomarker Response Directed Adaptive Sequential Treatment to Optimize Breast Cancer OutcomesP01CA210961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Nola M. Hylton-Watson · 2017 to 2026
$22.9M
Real-time In Vivo MRI Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Pre-Operative Treatment TrialsR01CA132870 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HYLTON-WATSON, NOLA M., NEWITT, DAVID C · 2008 to 2019
$4.8M
Dedicated breast PET and MRI for characterization of breast cancer and its response to therapyR01CA227763 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Natsuko Onishi Yamashita · 2019 to 2026
$3.6M
Strategy for combining circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of tumor burden for prediction of response and outcome in neoadjuvant-treated early breast cancerR01CA255442 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LI, WEN, MAGBANUA, MARK JESUS · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Quantitative Imaging for Assessing Breast Cancer Response to TreatmentU01CA225427 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HYLTON-WATSON, NOLA M. · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA227763NCI NIH HHS R01 CA255442NCI NIH HHS U01 CA225427NIH HHS P01 CA210961NIH HHS R01 CA132870NIH HHS R01 CA255442NIH HHS U01 CA225427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the inter-reader agreement of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements performed on breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for assessing treatment response in a multi-center clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer. DWIs from 103 breast cancer patients (mean age: 46 ± 11 years) acquired at baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment were evaluated independently by two readers. Three types of tumor regions of interests (ROIs) were delineated: multiple-slice restricted, single-slice restricted and single-slice tumor ROIs. Compared to tumor ROIs, restricted ROIs were limited to low ADC areas of enhancing tumor only. We found excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] ranged from 0.94 to 0.98) for mean ADC. Higher ICCs were observed in multiple-slice restricted ROIs (range: 0.97 to 0.98) than in other two ROI types (both in the range of 0.94 to 0.98). Among the three ROI types, the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were observed for mean ADC of multiple-slice restricted ROIs (0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-0.79 and 0.67, 95% CI: 0.53-0.81 for Reader 1 and Reader 2, respectively). In conclusion, mean ADC values of multiple-slice restricted ROI showed excellent agreement and similar predictive performance for pathologic complete response between the two readers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultBreastDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of Resultsbreast cancerdiffusion-weighted imagingneoadjuvant therapyreader variabilitytreatment response

Identifiers

PMID35645385
PMCPMC9149942
OpenAlexW4224309302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.