Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35645296›Full record

ReviewJournal of developmental biology2022

A Review of Delayed Delivery Models and the Analysis Method in Mice.

Hiroshi Yomogita, Naoyuki Miyasaka, Masami Kanai-Azuma

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of developmental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Scientific Papers by Developmental Biologists in Japan.Journal of developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroshi YomogitaDepartment of Perinatal and Women's Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6850-2053
Naoyuki MiyasakaDepartment of Perinatal and Women's Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Masami Kanai-AzumaCenter for Experimental Animals, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Tokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21H02387 and 18H02361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In humans, the incidence of post-term delivery is 1-10%. Post-term delivery significantly increases the risk of cesarean section or neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Despite these serious challenges, the cause of prolonged delivery remains unclear. Several common factors of delayed parturition between mice and humans will help elucidate the mechanisms of pregnancy and labor. At present, gene modification techniques are rapidly developing; however, there are limited reviews available describing the mouse phenotype analysis as a human model for post-term delivery. We classified the delayed-labor mice into nine types according to their causes. In mice, progesterone (P₄) maintains pregnancy, and the most common cause of delayed labor is luteolysis failure. Other contributing factors include humoral molecules in the fetus/placenta, uterine contractile dysfunction, poor cervical ripening, and delayed implantation. The etiology of delayed parturition is overexpression of the pregnancy maintenance mechanism or suppression of the labor induction mechanism. Here, we describe how to investigated their causes using mouse genetic analysis. In addition, we generated a list to identify the causes. Our review will help understand the findings obtained using the mouse model, providing a foundation for conducting more systematic research on delayed delivery.

Indexed as

delayed deliveryluteolysisprogesteroneprolonged delivery

Identifiers

PMID35645296
PMCPMC9149829
OpenAlexW4280575459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.