Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35645272›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2022

Computational Contact Pressure Prediction of CoCrMo, SS 316L and Ti6Al4V Femoral Head against UHMWPE Acetabular Cup under Gait Cycle.

J Jamari, Muhammad Imam Ammarullah, Gatot Santoso, S Sugiharto, Toto Supriyono, Akbar Teguh Prakoso, Hasan Basri, Emile van der Heide

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
21.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Abnormal metal ion levels following spinal instrumentation surgery.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

J JamariDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Central Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-6172-2635
Muhammad Imam AmmarullahUndip Biomechanics Engineering & Research Centre (UBM-ERC), Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Central Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-8845-7202
Gatot SantosoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Pasundan University, Bandung 40264, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-2368-193X
S SugihartoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Pasundan University, Bandung 40264, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-9971-2862
Toto SupriyonoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Pasundan University, Bandung 40264, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-1128-8161
Akbar Teguh PrakosoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Sriwijaya University, Indralaya 30662, South Sumatra, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-0295-7207
Hasan BasriDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Sriwijaya University, Indralaya 30662, South Sumatra, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-7867-9744
Emile van der HeideLaboratory for Surface Technology and Tribology, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5231-8665
Universitas Pasundan · IDDiponegoro University · IDSriwijaya University · IDUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to various concerns about the use of metal-on-metal that is detrimental to users, the use of metal as acetabular cup material was later changed to ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). However, the wear on UHMWPE releases polyethylene wear particles, which can trigger a negative body response and contribute to osteolysis. For reducing the wear of polyethylene, one of the efforts is to investigate the selection of metal materials. Cobalt chromium molybdenum (CoCrMo), stainless steel 316L (SS 316L), and titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) are the frequently employed materials. The computational evaluation of contact pressure was carried out using a two-dimensional axisymmetric model for UHMWPE acetabular cup paired with metal femoral head under gait cycle in this study. The results show Ti6Al4V-on-UHMWPE is able to reduce cumulative contact pressure compared to SS 316L-on-UHMWPE and CoCrMo-on-UHMWPE. Compared to Ti6Al4V-on-UHMWPE at peak loading, the difference in cumulative contact pressure to respective maximum contact pressure is 9.740% for SS 316L-on-UHMWPE and 11.038% for CoCrMo-on-UHMWPE.

Indexed as

CoCrMocontact pressureSS 316LTi6Al4Vtotal hip arthroplastyUHMWPE

Identifiers

PMID35645272
PMCPMC9149981
OpenAlexW4281385148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.