Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35644986›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2022

Wheat Panache: A pangenome graph database representing presence-absence variation across sixteen bread wheat genomes.

Philipp E Bayer, Jakob Petereit, Éloi Durant, Cécile Monat, Mathieu Rouard, Haifei Hu, Brett Chapman, Chengdao Li, Shifeng Cheng, Jacqueline Batley and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Accessing crop genetic diversity via pangenomics.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Philipp E BayerSchool of Biological Sciences, The Univ. of Western Australia, Perth, 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8530-3067
Jakob PetereitSchool of Biological Sciences, The Univ. of Western Australia, Perth, 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2159-0380
Éloi DurantDIADE, Univ. of Montpellier, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier, 34830, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2734-4327
Cécile MonatSyngenta Seeds S.A.S., 12 chemin de l'Hobit, Saint-Sauveur, 31790, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0574-3976
Mathieu RouardBioversity International, Parc Scientifique Agropolis II, Montpellier, 34397, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0284-1885
Haifei HuWestern Crop Genetics Alliance, Murdoch Univ., 90 South Street, Murdoch, 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1070-213X
Brett ChapmanWestern Crop Genetics Alliance, Murdoch Univ., 90 South Street, Murdoch, 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4484-2253
Chengdao LiWestern Crop Genetics Alliance, Murdoch Univ., 90 South Street, Murdoch, 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9653-2700
Shifeng ChengShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, China.
Jacqueline BatleySchool of Biological Sciences, The Univ. of Western Australia, Perth, 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5391-5824
David EdwardsSchool of Biological Sciences, The Univ. of Western Australia, Perth, 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7599-6760
The University of Western Australia · AUMurdoch University · AUCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRAgricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of humanity's most important staple crops, characterized by a large and complex genome with a high level of gene presence-absence variation (PAV) between cultivars, hampering genomic approaches for crop improvement. With the growing global population and the increasing impact of climate change on crop yield, there is an urgent need to apply genomic approaches to accelerate wheat breeding. With recent advances in DNA sequencing technology, a growing number of high-quality reference genomes are becoming available, reflecting the genetic content of a diverse range of cultivars. However, information on the presence or absence of genomic regions has been hard to visualize and interrogate because of the size of these genomes and the lack of suitable bioinformatics tools. To address this limitation, we have produced a wheat pangenome graph maintained within an online database to facilitate interrogation and comparison of wheat cultivar genomes. The database allows users to visualize regions of the pangenome to assess PAV between bread wheat genomes.

Indexed as

BreadTriticumGenome, PlantPlant BreedingSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID35644986
PMCPMC12806990
OpenAlexW4281784169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.