Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35644945›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2022

Cells responding to chemoattractant on a structured substrate.

Laura Rußbach, Mary Ecke, Joachim O Rädler, Charlott Leu, Günther Gerisch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura RußbachMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Cell Dynamics Group, Martinsried, Germany.
Mary EckeMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Cell Dynamics Group, Martinsried, Germany.
Joachim O RädlerLMU Munich, Soft Condensed Matter Group, München, Germany.
Charlott LeuLMU Munich, Soft Condensed Matter Group, München, Germany.
Günther GerischMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Cell Dynamics Group, Martinsried, Germany. Electronic address: gerisch@biochem.mpg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell migration on an adhesive substrate surface comprises actin-based protrusion at the front and retraction of the tail in combination with coordinated adhesion to, and detachment from, the substrate. To study the effect of cell-to-substrate adhesion on the chemotactic response of Dictyostelium discoideum cells, we exposed the cells to patterned substrate surfaces consisting of adhesive and inert areas, and forced them by a gradient of chemoattractant to enter the border between the two areas. Wild-type as well as myosin II-deficient cells stop at the border of an adhesive area. They do not detach with their rear part, while on the nonadhesive area they protrude pseudopods at their front toward the source of chemoattractant. Avoidance of the nonadhesive area may cause a cell to move in tangential direction relative to the attractant gradient, keeping its tail at the border of the adhesive surface.

Indexed as

DictyosteliumActinsCell MovementChemotactic FactorsChemotaxisMyosin Type IIPseudopodiaActinsChemotactic FactorsMyosin Type II

Identifiers

PMID35644945
PMCPMC9300663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.