Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35644901›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2022

Ancestral sequence reconstruction of the CYP711 family reveals functional divergence in strigolactone biosynthetic enzymes associated with gene duplication events in monocot grasses.

Marcos H Vinde, Da Cao, Rebecca J Chesterfield, Kaori Yoneyama, Yosephine Gumulya, Raine E S Thomson, Tebogo Matila, Birgitta E Ebert, Christine A Beveridge, Claudia E Vickers and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolution of plant metabolism: the state-of-the-art.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Applications of ancestral sequence reconstruction for understanding the evolution of plant specialized metabolism.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marcos H VindeAustralian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6103-316X
Da CaoSchool of Biological Sciences, ARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7939-1048
Rebecca J ChesterfieldAustralian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7900-6998
Kaori YoneyamaGraduate School of Agriculture, Ehime University, Ehime, 790-8566, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3965-1647
Yosephine GumulyaSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0529-404X
Raine E S ThomsonSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3545-6692
Tebogo MatilaSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4067-984X
Birgitta E EbertAustralian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9425-7509
Christine A BeveridgeSchool of Biological Sciences, ARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0878-3110
Claudia E VickersJapan Science and Technology Agency, PRESTO, Saitama, 332-0012, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0792-050X
Elizabeth M J GillamSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0378-793X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The strigolactone (SL) class of phytohormones shows broad chemical diversity, the functional importance of which remains to be fully elucidated, along with the enzymes responsible for the diversification of the SL structure. Here we explore the functional evolution of the highly conserved CYP711A P450 family, members of which catalyze several key monooxygenation reactions in the strigolactone pathway. Ancestral sequence reconstruction was utilized to infer ancestral CYP711A sequences based on a comprehensive set of extant CYP711 sequences. Eleven ancestral enzymes, corresponding to key points in the CYP711A phylogenetic tree, were resurrected and their activity was characterized towards the native substrate carlactone and the pure enantiomers of the synthetic strigolactone analogue, GR24. The ancestral and extant CYP711As tested accepted GR24 as a substrate and catalyzed several diversifying oxidation reactions on the structure. Evidence was obtained for functional divergence in the CYP711A family. The monocot group 3 ancestor, arising from gene duplication events within monocot grasses, showed both increased catalytic activity towards GR24 and high stereoselectivity towards the GR24 isomer resembling strigol-type SLs. These results are consistent with a role for CYP711As in strigolactone diversification in early land plants, which may have extended to the diversification of strigol-type SLs.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationPoaceaeHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingLactonesPhylogenyPlant Growth RegulatorsGR24 strigolactoneHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingLactonesPlant Growth Regulatorsancestral sequence reconstructionCYP711cytochrome P450GR24phytohormoneplant evolutionstrigolactoneterrestrialization

Identifiers

PMID35644901
PMCPMC9544836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.