ArticleMicrobiome2022
Effect of cryopreservation medium conditions on growth and isolation of gut anaerobes from human faecal samples.
Article in Microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Precision microbiome medicine and therapeutics: the enabling role of in vitro gut models.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- Revival of Mucin-Degrading Human-Derived Fecal Microbial Consortia After Cryopreservation.microPublication biology · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota profiling in Lebanese ulcerative colitis patients and healthy controls from a pilot study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative study of sample storage conditions on gut dysbiosis in peripheral artery disease.Research square · 2025Article
- Culturable Human Microorganisms and the Impact of Transportation Conditions on Cultivability.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Evaluating long-term stool preservation methods for maximizing the recovery of viable human fecal microbiota.Gut microbes reports · 2025Article
- Trehalose and maltodextrin preserve microbial community structure in freeze-dried fecal samples for fecal microbiota transplantation.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Impact of Clinical and Pharmacological Parameters on Faecal Microbiota Transplantation Outcome in Clostridioides difficile Infections: Results of a 5-Year French National Survey.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Use of frozen native feces for fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrentAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Efficacy assessment of different cryoprotectants for preserving the viability of Enterobacterales strains at - 20 °C.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- FBS-based cryoprotective compositions for effective cryopreservation of gut microbiota and key intestinal microorganisms.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Impact of cryoprotective agents on human gut microbes and in vitro stabilized artificial gut microbiota communities.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Article
- Water-Insoluble Polysaccharide Extracted fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Validation of a batch cultivation protocol for fecal microbiota of Kenyan infants.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
- Development of culture methods capable of culturing a wide range of predominant species of intestinal bacteria.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNovel strategies for anaerobic bacterial isolations from human faecal samples and various initiatives to generate culture collections of gut-derived bacteria have instigated considerable interest for the development of novel microbiota-based treatments. Early in the process of building a culture collection, optimal faecal sample preservation is essential to safeguard the viability of the broadest taxonomic diversity range possible. In contrast to the much more established faecal storage conditions for meta-omics applications, the impact of stool sample preservation conditions on bacterial growth recovery and isolation remains largely unexplored. In this study, aliquoted faecal samples from eleven healthy human volunteers selected based on a range of physicochemical and microbiological gradients were cryopreserved at - 80 °C either without the addition of any medium (dry condition) or in different Cary-Blair medium conditions with or without a cryoprotectant, i.e. 20% (v/v) glycerol or 5% (v/v) DMSO. Faecal aliquots were subjected to bulk 16S rRNA gene sequencing as well as dilution plating on modified Gifu Anaerobic Medium after preservation for culturable fraction profiling and generation of bacterial culture collections.
resultsAnalyses of compositional variation showed that cryopreservation medium conditions affected quantitative recovery but not the overall community composition of cultured fractions. Post-preservation sample dilution and richness of the uncultured source samples were the major drivers of the cultured fraction richness at genus level. However, preservation conditions differentially affected recovery of specific genera. Presence-absence analysis indicated that twenty-two of the 45 most abundant common genera (>0.01% abundance, dilution 10
conclusionOur results demonstrate that preservation methods partly determine richness and taxonomic diversity of gut anaerobes recovered from faecal samples. Complementing the current standard practice of cryopreserving stool samples in dry conditions with other preservation conditions, such as Cary-Blair medium with DMSO, could increase the species diversity of gut-associated culture collections. Video abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.