Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35644565›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia2022

Pan-Driver-Negatives versus Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutants for C-Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma with Ground-Glass Opacity.

Ming Li, Junjie Xi, Huan Zhang, Xing Jin, Jianrong Zhang, Mingxiang Feng, Cheng Zhan, Qun Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ming LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Junjie XiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Huan ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xing JinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jianrong ZhangVictorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mingxiang FengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Cheng ZhanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Qun WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Fudan University · CNZhongshan Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to verify the prognosis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation of clinical (c)-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with the ground-glass opacity (GGO) component.

methodsWe evaluated 226 cases of surgically resected c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with GGO component. Endpoints were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to estimate the survival differences. Prognostic factors were assessed using the univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.

resultsAmong the 226 cases, 177 cases harbored the EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma with the GGO component. The mean duration of follow-up time was 54.4 ± 1.2 months. The 5-year OS and RFS did not differ significantly between the EGFR-mutant and wild-type groups (5-year OS 100% vs. 94.3%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.276, P = 0.168; 5-year RFS 94.7% vs. 95.7%, HR 0.873, P = 0.864). Multivariable Cox hazard model revealed that radiologically solid component size (P = 0.010) and pathological node-positive (P = 0.036) were significant predictors of an inferior RFS.

conclusionEGFR-mutant was not a prognostic factor of OS and RFS for c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with the GGO component. Radiologically solid component size and pathological lymph node status were independent prognostic factors of worse RFS.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungLung NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsHumansNeoplasm StagingPneumonectomyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeErbB Receptorsepidermal growth factor receptorground-glass opacitylung adenocarcinomaprognosis

Identifiers

PMID35644565
PMCPMC9585333
OpenAlexW4282928765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.