ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022
Treatment planning system commissioning of the first clinical biology-guided radiotherapy machine.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Journey through technological advancements in radiation therapy.World journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Dosimetric Feasibility of Dose-Painting Radiation Therapy for Targeting Hypoxia in Prostate Cancer on a Novel Ring Gantry Radiation Therapy System.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- A Clinical Workflow for Evaluating Dose to Organs at Risk After Biology-Guided Radiation Therapy Delivery.Cancers · 2025Article
- An automated daily QA strategy for dosimetry and imaging guidance check of a novel PET/CT ring gantry linac.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Commissioning and dosimetric verification of volumetric modulated arc therapy for multiple modalities using electronic portal imaging device-based 3D dosimetry system: a novel approach.Radiological physics and technology · 2024Article
- First-Year Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy/Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Using a Novel Biology-Guided Radiation Therapy Machine.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Preclinical Evaluation ofInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2023Article
- Evaluation of fan-beam kilovoltage computed tomography image quality on a novel biological-guided radiotherapy platform.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Treatment planning system commissioning of the first clinical biology-guided radiotherapy machine.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- IMRT and SBRT Treatment Planning Study for the First Clinical Biology-Guided Radiotherapy System.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Mitigation of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning Errors on the Novel RefleXion X1 System Using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Within Six Sigma Framework.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
- An Investigation into Planned Dose Preservation of Biology-guided Radiotherapy Under Various Radiopharmaceutical Uptake Conditions.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Expanding SCINTIX Biology-Guided Radiotherapy Beyond Lung and Bone: A Planning Feasibility and Dosimetric Study on the RefleXion X1 System.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe RefleXion X1 is a novel radiotherapy machine designed for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT). Its treatment planning system (TPS) generates IMRT and SBRT plans for a 6MV-FFF beam delivered axially via 50 firing positions with the couch advancing every 2.1 mm. The purpose of this work is to report the TPS commissioning results for the first clinical installation of RefleXion™ X1.
methodsCT images of multiple phantoms were imported into the RefleXion TPS to evaluate the accuracy of data transfer, anatomical modeling, plan evaluation, and dose calculation. Comparisons were made between the X1, Eclipse™, and MIM™. Dosimetric parameters for open static fields were evaluated in water and heterogeneous slab phantoms. Representative clinical IMRT and SBRT cases were planned and verified with ion chamber, film, and ArcCHECK
resultsThe average difference between the TPS-reported and known HU values was -1.4 ± 6.0 HU. For static fields, the agreements between the TPS-calculated and measured PDD
conclusionsThe TPS commissioning results of the RefleXion X1 TPS were within the tolerances specified by AAPM TG 53, MPPG 5.a, TG 119, and TG 148. A subset of the commissioning tests has been identified as baseline data for an ongoing QA program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.