Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35643868›Full record

Trial reportLeukemia2022

Bosutinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: final results from the BFORE trial.

Tim H Brümmendorf, Jorge E Cortes, Dragana Milojkovic, Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini, Richard E Clark, Philipp le Coutre, Valentin Garcia-Gutierrez, Charles Chuah, Vamsi Kota, Jeffrey H Lipton and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Leukemia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 18 institutions in 10 countries.

Tim H Brümmendorf *Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany. tbruemmendorf@ukaachen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9677-3723
Jorge E Cortes *Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8636-1071
Dragana MilojkovicHammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Carlo Gambacorti-PasseriniUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6058-515X
Richard E ClarkDepartment of Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Philipp le CoutreCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Valentin Garcia-GutierrezHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4752-0815
Charles ChuahSingapore General Hospital, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Vamsi KotaGeorgia Cancer Center, Augusta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5290-9289
Jeffrey H LiptonPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Philippe RousselotCentre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3238-4494
Michael J MauroMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2251-4032
Andreas HochhausKlinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
Rafael Hurtado MonroyHospital Angeles Pedregal, Mexico City, Mexico.
Eric LeipPfizer Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Simon PurcellPfizer Ltd, London, UK.
Anne YverPfizer Inc, Paris, France.
Andrea ViqueiraPfizer SLU, Madrid, Spain.
Michael W DeiningerUniversity of Utah Health Care, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
BFORE study investigators
National Cancer Center of Georgia · GECentre Hospitalier de Versailles · FRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHammersmith Hospital · GBHospital Angeles Pedregal · MXHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESJena University Hospital · DEMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USPfizer (France) · FRPfizer (United Kingdom) · GBPfizer (United States) · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CASaint Louis University · ESSingapore General Hospital · SGUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of Utah Health Care · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This analysis from the multicenter, open-label, phase 3 BFORE trial reports efficacy and safety of bosutinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) after five years' follow-up. Patients were randomized to 400-mg once-daily bosutinib (n = 268) or imatinib (n = 268; three untreated). At study completion, 59.7% of bosutinib- and 58.1% of imatinib-treated patients remained on study treatment. Median duration of treatment and time on study was 55 months in both groups. Cumulative major molecular response (MMR) rate by 5 years was higher with bosutinib versus imatinib (73.9% vs. 64.6%; odds ratio, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.08-2.28]), as were cumulative MR

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsLeukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-PhaseQuinolinesAniline CompoundsHumansImatinib MesylateNitrilesProtein Kinase InhibitorsTreatment OutcomeAniline CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsbosutinibImatinib MesylateNitrilesProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID35643868
PMCPMC9252917
OpenAlexW4281951662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.