ArticlePediatric surgery international2022
Growth assessments for children with recurrent tracheoesophageal fistulas.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess the growth status of children with recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula (rTEF), and determine the possible risk factors of growth retardation (GR).
methodsThe medical records of 83 patients with rTEF who underwent surgical repair were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were retrospectively divided into two groups according to whether they had GR. The clinical variables were compared between the GR and non-GR groups. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to identify the risk factors for GR.
resultsEighty-three children diagnosed with rTEF were included in this study. After a median follow-up of 31.4 (19.8, 48.7) months, GR occurred in 28 patients (33.7%). Among them, six patients with only weight for age Z score (WAZ) < -2SD, five patients with only height for age Z score (HAZ) < -2SD, and six patients with only BMI for age Z score (BAZ) < -2SD, while seven patients with both WAZ and HAZ < -2SD and four patients with both WAZ, HAZ and BAZ < -2SD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that birth weight, anastomotic stricture and dysphagia after rTEF repair were independent risk factors with OR of 0.325 (0.119, 0.891), 4.396 (1.451, 13.324) and 5.341 (1.153, 24.752) for GR, respectively.
conclusionsGR is a common complication after rTEF repair. Birth weight, anastomotic stricture and dysphagia after rTEF repair are independent risk factors affecting growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.