Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35643736›Full record

SynthesisAnais brasileiros de dermatologia

Accuracy of direct examination and culture as compared to the anatomopathological examination for the diagnosis of chromoblastomycosis: a systematic review.

Jules Rimet Borges, Bárbara Álvares Salum Ximenes, Flávia Tandaya Grandi Miranda, Giordana Bruna Moreira Peres, Isabella Toscano Hayasaki, Luiz César de Camargo Ferro, Mayra Ianhez, Marco Tulio Antonio Garcia-Zapata

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Anais brasileiros de dermatologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. In vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Profile of ClinicalInfection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jules Rimet BorgesPostgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil. Electronic address: rimetborges@hotmail.com.
Bárbara Álvares Salum XimenesDepartment of Tropical Medicine and Dermatology, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Flávia Tandaya Grandi MirandaDepartment of Tropical Medicine and Dermatology, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Giordana Bruna Moreira PeresFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Isabella Toscano HayasakiFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Luiz César de Camargo FerroFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Mayra IanhezDepartment of Tropical Medicine and Dermatology Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Marco Tulio Antonio Garcia-ZapataDepartment of Tropical Medicine and Dermatology Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChromoblastomycosis is a skin infection caused by dematiaceous fungi that take the form of muriform cells in the tissue. It mainly manifests as verrucous plaques on the lower limbs of rural workers in tropical countries.

objectivesThe primary objective of this review is to evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic methods for the identification of chromoblastomycosis, considering the histopathological examination as the reference test.

methodsMEDLINE, LILACS and Scielo databases were consulted using the terms "chromoblastomycosis" AND "diagnosis". The eligibility criteria were: studies that evaluated the accuracy of tests for the diagnosis of chromoblastomycosis. Eleven studies were selected. Statistical analysis included the calculation of sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic methods.

resultsConsidering the histopathological examination as the reference test, the culture showed a sensitivity (S) of 37.5% - 90.9% and a specificity (Sp) of 100%; while direct mycological examination showed S =  50% - 91.6% and Sp of 100% . Considering the culture as the reference test, the serology (precipitation techniques) showed S  of 36% - 99%; and Sp  of 80% - 100%; while the intradermal test showed S  of 83.3% - 100% and Sp  of 99.4% - 100%. STUDY LIMITATIONS: The small number of studies and very discrepant sensitivity results among them do not allow the calculation of summary measures through a meta-analysis.

conclusionsDirect mycological examination, culture, intradermal test and serology show sensitivity and specificity values ​​for the diagnosis of chromoblastomycosis with no significant difference between the studies.

Indexed as

ChromoblastomycosisHumansMicrobiological TechniquesSensitivity and SpecificityChromoblastomycosisDiagnosisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35643736
PMCPMC9263652
OpenAlexW4281480086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.