Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35643729›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2023

Diagnostic value of multiparametric MRI in detecting residual or recurrent prostate cancer after high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Hyungwoo Ahn, Sung Il Hwang, Taek Min Kim, Hak Jong Lee, Gheeyoung Choe, Sung Kyu Hong, Seok-Soo Byun, Hakmin Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hyungwoo Ahn *Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Sung Il Hwang *Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Taek Min KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Hak Jong LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Program in Nano Science and Technology, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0858-7873
Gheeyoung ChoeDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Sung Kyu HongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8344-6774
Seok-Soo ByunDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Hakmin LeeDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea. godflesh0@naver.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1247-9958
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of follow-up multiparametric MRI for prediction of recurrent prostate cancer after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and to find other, if any, clinical or radiological predictors. MATERIALS AND

methodsPost-HIFU MRIs of 110 consecutive patients who underwent follow-up biopsies between August 2019 and April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and the likelihood of recurrence was assessed on a five-point Likert scale by two board-certified uroradiologists. Diagnostic performance of the Likert scale assigned to the post-HIFU MRI was assessed using the follow-up biopsy results as a reference standard. Among the clinical and radiological variables, predictors of the recurrence were examined through logistic regression.

resultsIn per-patient and per-sector analyses, Likert scale on post-HIFU MRI showed a sensitivity and specificity of 0.37 and 0.97, and 0.42 and 0.87, respectively, in predicting recurrence. Two patients with high suspicion on MRI required additional treatment to regain biochemical control despite negative biopsies. High suspicion on post-HIFU MRI (odds ratio = 1.74; p < 0.01), and more cancer-positive cores on initial biopsy (odds ratio = 1.25; p = 0.03) were independent predictors of recurrence.

conclusionAlbeit with low sensitivity, high suspicion on post-HIFU MRI may be clinically important because of its high specificity, especially when considering the possibility of sampling error in biopsies. Patients with a high number of cancer-positive cores at diagnosis should avoid HIFU as they have an increased risk of recurrence.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35643729
OpenAlexW4281878501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.