Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35643578›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2022

Partners matter: The psychosocial well-being of couples when dealing with endometriosis.

Maren Schick, Ariane Germeyer, Bettina Böttcher, Stephanie Hecht, Magdalena Geiser, Sabine Rösner, Monika Eckstein, Kilian Vomstein, Bettina Toth, Thomas Strowitzki and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maren SchickInstitute of Medical Psychology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Ruprecht-Karls University, Heidelberg, Bergheimer Str. 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany. maren.schick@mail.de.
Ariane GermeyerDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Women's Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Bettina BöttcherDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stephanie HechtDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Women's Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Magdalena GeiserDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sabine RösnerDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Women's Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Monika EcksteinInstitute of Medical Psychology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Ruprecht-Karls University, Heidelberg, Bergheimer Str. 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kilian VomsteinDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Bettina TothDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Thomas StrowitzkiDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Women's Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tewes WischmannInstitute of Medical Psychology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Ruprecht-Karls University, Heidelberg, Bergheimer Str. 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Beate DitzenInstitute of Medical Psychology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Ruprecht-Karls University, Heidelberg, Bergheimer Str. 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversität Innsbruck · ATInnsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis is often associated with severe dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain and dyspareunia and has a high impact on daily life as well as sexuality. Quality of partnership positively influences the course of various diseases and ability to cope with emotional and physical distress. However, studies focusing on the male partners of endometriosis patients are rare, and even less is known about the reciprocal relationship in these couples. Therefore, this study aims to explore the interrelations in couples with endometriosis in matters of psychological distress, sexual and partnership satisfaction and social support.

methodsThe cross-sectional study was conducted in two university-affiliated fertility centres in Germany and Austria with n = 104 female/male couples affected by endometriosis. Participants completed a questionnaire regarding endometriosis, partnership, sexuality, stress, anxiety, depression and social support. Both women and men were asked about the impact of women's endometriosis-related pain (IEP) on their everyday life (e.g. leisure time). Data were analysed using the Actor-Partner-Interdependence Model.

resultsSignificant partner effects were evident: High depression, anxiety and stress scores in women were associated with a higher IEP in men (all p ≤ 0.01), reciprocally high stress and depression scores in men were correlated with a higher IEP in women (all p ≤ 0.05). Less sexual satisfaction in women was associated with a higher IEP in men (p = 0.040). There was a significant reciprocal association between the perceived lack of understanding from the social environment and a higher IEP, for both women (p = 0.022) and men (p = 0.027).

conclusionsThe male partner should be taken into account when counselling or treating women with endometriosis. Our study shows a high interdependence and reciprocal influence from both partners-positively and negatively-concerning psychological distress and sexual satisfaction. Furthermore, there ought to be more awareness for the psychosocial impact of endometriosis, especially in regard to social support and understanding. Talking about and improving sexual satisfaction as well as enhancing stress reducing techniques may hold great benefits for dealing with endometriosis. Registration number The study is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), number DRKS00014362.

Indexed as

EndometriosisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePersonal SatisfactionQuality of LifeSexual BehaviorActor-partner-interdependence modelEndometriosisPartnershipPsychological distressSexualitySocial support

Identifiers

PMID35643578
PMCPMC9148469
OpenAlexW4281734287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.