Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35643497›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2022

Cervical cancer knowledge and barriers and facilitators to screening among women in two rural communities in Guatemala: a qualitative study.

Kristin G Bevilacqua, Anna Gottschlich, Audrey R Murchland, Christian S Alvarez, Alvaro Rivera-Andrade, Rafael Meza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Low Levels of Lifetime Pap Test Receipt Among Vulnerable Guatemalans.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Kristin G BevilacquaDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. kbevila1@jhu.edu.
Anna GottschlichBC Women's Hospital and Health Service, Women's Health Research Institute, 4500 Oak St, Vancouver, BC, V6H N9, Canada.
Audrey R MurchlandDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Christian S AlvarezInstituto de Nutrición de Centro América y Panamá,, Calzada Roosevelt 6-25 Zona 11, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Alvaro Rivera-AndradeInstituto de Nutrición de Centro América y Panamá,, Calzada Roosevelt 6-25 Zona 11, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Rafael MezaSchool of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama · GTHarvard University · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Michigan · USWomen's Health Research Institute · CA

Funding

Biostatistics Training Program in Cancer ResearchT32CA083654 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani, Kelley McLain Kidwell · 2002 to 2026
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA083654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 80% of deaths due to cervical cancer occur in low- and middle-income countries. In Guatemala, limited access to effective screening and treatment has resulted in alarmingly high cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates. Despite access to free-of-cost screening, women continue to face significant barriers in obtaining screening for cervical cancer.

methodsIn-depth interviews (N = 21) were conducted among women in two rural communities in Guatemala. Interviews followed a semi-structured guide to explore knowledge related to cervical cancer and barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening.

resultsCervical cancer knowledge was variable across sites and across women. Women reported barriers to screening including ancillary costs, control by male partners, poor provider communication and systems-level resource constraints. Facilitators to screening included a desire to know one's own health status, conversations with other women, including community health workers, and extra-governmental health campaigns.

conclusionsFindings speak to the many challenges women face in obtaining screening for cervical cancer in their communities as well as existing facilitators. Future interventions must focus on improving cervical cancer-related knowledge as well as mitigating barriers and leveraging facilitators to promote screening.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGuatemalaHumansMaleMass ScreeningRural PopulationBarriers and facilitatorsCervical cancerCervical cancer screeningHealth disparities

Identifiers

PMID35643497
PMCPMC9148459
OpenAlexW4281671887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.