ArticleMicrobial cell factories2022
Development and application of a fast and efficient CRISPR-based genetic toolkit in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LB1ba02.
Article in Microbial cell factories, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic and Phenotypic Evaluation of the Gliadin-Degrading Probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens EG025 from Cheonggukjang for Celiac Disease Treatment.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Biosurfactants in Food: Advances, Innovative Applications and Functional Perspectives.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advancing cellulose degradation through synthetic biology: engineered pathways and microbial systems for sustainable biomass conversion.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Prospects and challenges regarding biosurfactants in advancing the petroleum industry.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Efficient expression of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase in Bacillus subtilis via CRISPR/Cas9n and its immobilization.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Unlocking the potential of biosurfactants: Innovations in metabolic and genetic engineering for sustainable industrial and environmental solutions.Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Review
- Review
- Genetic and metabolic engineering for poly-γ-glutamic acid production: current progress, challenges, and prospects.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBacillus amyloliquefaciens is generally recognized as food safe (GRAS) microbial host and important enzyme-producing strain in the industry. B.amyloliquefaciens LB1ba02 is a production strain suitable for secreting mesophilic α-amylase in the industry. Nevertheless, due to the low transformation efficiency and restriction-modification system, the development of its CRISPR tool lags far behind other species and strains from the genus Bacillus. This work was undertaken to develop a fast and efficient gene-editing tool in B.amyloliquefaciens LB1ba02.
resultsIn this study, we fused the nuclease-deficient mutant Cas9n (D10A) of Cas9 with activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) and developed a fast and efficient base editing system for the first time in B. amyloliquefaciens LB1ba02. The system was verified by inactivating the pyrF gene coding orotidine 5'-phosphate decarboxylase and the mutant could grow normally on M9 medium supplemented with 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) and uridine (U). Our base editing system has a 6nt editing window consisting of an all-in-one temperature-sensitive plasmid that facilitates multiple rounds of genome engineering in B. amyloliquefaciens LB1ba02. The total editing efficiency of this method reached 100% and it achieved simultaneous editing of three loci with an efficiency of 53.3%. In addition, based on the base editing CRISPR/Cas9n-AID system, we also developed a single plasmid CRISPR/Cas9n system suitable for rapid gene knockout and integration. The knockout efficiency for a single gene reached 93%. Finally, we generated 4 genes (aprE, nprE, wprA, and bamHIR) mutant strain, LB1ba02△4. The mutant strain secreted 1.25-fold more α-amylase into the medium than the wild-type strain.
conclusionsThe CRISPR/Cas9n-AID and CRISPR/Cas9n systems developed in this work proved to be a fast and efficient genetic manipulation tool in a restriction-modification system and poorly transformable strain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.