ArticleBMC cancer2022
Validation of genomic and transcriptomic models of homologous recombination deficiency in a real-world pan-cancer cohort.
Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- A phase II, randomized, double-blind study of the use of rucaparib vs. placebo maintenance therapy in metastatic and recurrent endometrial cancer.Gynecologic oncology · 2025Trial
- Deep learning-based prediction of gene expression from histopathology identifies NR5A1 as a candidate biomarker and druggable target in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- A Clinically Translatable Multimodal Deep Learning Model for HRD Detection from Histopathology Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of telomere length in peripheral blood of breast cancer BRCA1 mutation carriers and non-carriers.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the 1021-HRD assay compared to established HRD testing platforms in ovarian cancer.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Cross-platform comparison of gene expression-based cancer molecular subtyping reveals discrepancies with exome capture methods.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Development and Application of MiMouse, a Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Panel for Credentialing Mouse Tumor Models.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Real-World Validation of the Purity Independent Subtyping of Tumors Classifier for Informing Therapy Selection in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of the Immune Profile Score (IPS), a novel multiomic algorithmic assay for stratifying outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients with advanced solid cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- Unraveling Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Currently Available Testing Platforms.Cancers · 2025Review
- Molecular consequences of acute versus chronic CDK12 loss in prostate carcinoma nominates distinct therapeutic strategies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Evaluative Methodology for HRD Testing: Development of Standard Tools for Consistency Assessment.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing landscape: clinical applications and technical validation for routine diagnostics.Biomarker research · 2025Review
- Article
- Homologous recombination deficiency test validation in patients with high-grade advanced ovarian cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Pan-Cancer Analysis of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Cell Lines.Cancer research communications · 2024Article
- Reversion of pathogeniciScience · 2024Article
- expHRD: an individualized, transcriptome-based prediction model for homologous recombination deficiency assessment in cancer.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Beta-defensin index: A functional biomarker for oral cancer detection.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the introduction of DNA-damaging therapies into standard of care cancer treatment, there is a growing need for predictive diagnostics assessing homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status across tumor types. Following the strong clinical evidence for the utility of DNA-sequencing-based HRD testing in ovarian cancer, and growing evidence in breast cancer, we present analytical validation of the Tempus HRD-DNA test. We further developed, validated, and explored the Tempus HRD-RNA model, which uses gene expression data from 16,750 RNA-seq samples to predict HRD status from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples across numerous cancer types.
methodsGenomic and transcriptomic profiling was performed using next-generation sequencing from Tempus xT, Tempus xO, Tempus xE, Tempus RS, and Tempus RS.v2 assays on 48,843 samples. Samples were labeled based on their BRCA1, BRCA2 and selected Homologous Recombination Repair pathway gene (CDK12, PALB2, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D) mutational status to train and validate HRD-DNA, a genome-wide loss-of-heterozygosity biomarker, and HRD-RNA, a logistic regression model trained on gene expression.
resultsIn a sample of 2058 breast and 1216 ovarian tumors, BRCA status was predicted by HRD-DNA with F1-scores of 0.98 and 0.96, respectively. Across an independent set of 1363 samples across solid tumor types, the HRD-RNA model was predictive of BRCA status in prostate, pancreatic, and non-small cell lung cancer, with F1-scores of 0.88, 0.69, and 0.62, respectively.
conclusionsWe predict HRD-positive patients across many cancer types and believe both HRD models may generalize to other mechanisms of HRD outside of BRCA loss. HRD-RNA complements DNA-based HRD detection methods, especially for indications with low prevalence of BRCA alterations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.