Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35643464›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Validation of genomic and transcriptomic models of homologous recombination deficiency in a real-world pan-cancer cohort.

Benjamin D Leibowitz, Bonnie V Dougherty, Joshua S K Bell, Joshuah Kapilivsky, Jackson Michuda, Andrew J Sedgewick, Wesley A Munson, Tushar A Chandra, Jonathan R Dry, Nike Beaubier and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Reversion of pathogeniciScience · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin D Leibowitz *Tempus Labs, 600 W Chicago Ave Ste #510, Chicago, IL, 60654, United States.
Bonnie V Dougherty *Tempus Labs, 600 W Chicago Ave Ste #510, Chicago, IL, 60654, United States.
Joshua S K Bell *Tempus Labs, 600 W Chicago Ave Ste #510, Chicago, IL, 60654, United States.
Joshuah KapilivskyTempus Labs, 600 W Chicago Ave Ste #510, Chicago, IL, 60654, United States.
Jackson MichudaTempus Labs, 600 W Chicago Ave Ste #510, Chicago, IL, 60654, United States.
Andrew J SedgewickTempus Labs, 600 W Chicago Ave Ste #510, Chicago, IL, 60654, United States.
Wesley A MunsonTempus Labs, 600 W Chicago Ave Ste #510, Chicago, IL, 60654, United States.
Tushar A ChandraTempus Labs, 600 W Chicago Ave Ste #510, Chicago, IL, 60654, United States.
Jonathan R DryTempus Labs, 600 W Chicago Ave Ste #510, Chicago, IL, 60654, United States.
Nike BeaubierTempus Labs, 600 W Chicago Ave Ste #510, Chicago, IL, 60654, United States.
Catherine IgartuaTempus Labs, 600 W Chicago Ave Ste #510, Chicago, IL, 60654, United States.
Timothy TaxterTempus Labs, 600 W Chicago Ave Ste #510, Chicago, IL, 60654, United States. tim@tempus.com.
Tempus Labs (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the introduction of DNA-damaging therapies into standard of care cancer treatment, there is a growing need for predictive diagnostics assessing homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status across tumor types. Following the strong clinical evidence for the utility of DNA-sequencing-based HRD testing in ovarian cancer, and growing evidence in breast cancer, we present analytical validation of the Tempus HRD-DNA test. We further developed, validated, and explored the Tempus HRD-RNA model, which uses gene expression data from 16,750 RNA-seq samples to predict HRD status from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples across numerous cancer types.

methodsGenomic and transcriptomic profiling was performed using next-generation sequencing from Tempus xT, Tempus xO, Tempus xE, Tempus RS, and Tempus RS.v2 assays on 48,843 samples. Samples were labeled based on their BRCA1, BRCA2 and selected Homologous Recombination Repair pathway gene (CDK12, PALB2, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D) mutational status to train and validate HRD-DNA, a genome-wide loss-of-heterozygosity biomarker, and HRD-RNA, a logistic regression model trained on gene expression.

resultsIn a sample of 2058 breast and 1216 ovarian tumors, BRCA status was predicted by HRD-DNA with F1-scores of 0.98 and 0.96, respectively. Across an independent set of 1363 samples across solid tumor types, the HRD-RNA model was predictive of BRCA status in prostate, pancreatic, and non-small cell lung cancer, with F1-scores of 0.88, 0.69, and 0.62, respectively.

conclusionsWe predict HRD-positive patients across many cancer types and believe both HRD models may generalize to other mechanisms of HRD outside of BRCA loss. HRD-RNA complements DNA-based HRD detection methods, especially for indications with low prevalence of BRCA alterations.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsFemaleGenomicsHomologous RecombinationHumansRNATranscriptomeRNADiagnostic biomarkersGene expression profilingHomologous recombination\

Identifiers

PMID35643464
PMCPMC9148513
OpenAlexW4281783847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.