Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35643435›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2022

A comparison of methods for multiple degree of freedom testing in repeated measures RNA-sequencing experiments.

Elizabeth A Wynn, Brian E Vestal, Tasha E Fingerlin, Camille M Moore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Integrative RNA-seq analysis reveals immune-related hub genesInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth A WynnDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Brian E VestalCenter for Genes, Environment and Health, National Jewish Health, 1400 Jackson St, Denver, 80206, CO, USA.
Tasha E FingerlinCenter for Genes, Environment and Health, National Jewish Health, 1400 Jackson St, Denver, 80206, CO, USA.
Camille M MooreCenter for Genes, Environment and Health, National Jewish Health, 1400 Jackson St, Denver, 80206, CO, USA. mooreca@njhealth.org.
University of Colorado Denver · USNational Jewish Health · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the cost of RNA-sequencing decreases, complex study designs, including paired, longitudinal, and other correlated designs, become increasingly feasible. These studies often include multiple hypotheses and thus multiple degree of freedom tests, or tests that evaluate multiple hypotheses jointly, are often useful for filtering the gene list to a set of interesting features for further exploration while controlling the false discovery rate. Though there are several methods which have been proposed for analyzing correlated RNA-sequencing data, there has been little research evaluating and comparing the performance of multiple degree of freedom tests across methods.

methodsWe evaluated 11 different methods for modelling correlated RNA-sequencing data by performing a simulation study to compare the false discovery rate, power, and model convergence rate across several hypothesis tests and sample size scenarios. We also applied each method to a real longitudinal RNA-sequencing dataset.

resultsLinear mixed modelling using transformed data had the best false discovery rate control while maintaining relatively high power. However, this method had high model non-convergence, particularly at small sample sizes. No method had high power at the lowest sample size. We found a mix of conservative and anti-conservative behavior across the other methods, which was influenced by the sample size and the hypothesis being evaluated. The patterns observed in the simulation study were largely replicated in the analysis of a longitudinal study including data from intensive care unit patients experiencing cardiogenic or septic shock.

conclusionsMultiple degree of freedom testing is a valuable tool in longitudinal and other correlated RNA-sequencing experiments. Of the methods that we investigated, linear mixed modelling had the best overall combination of power and false discovery rate control. Other methods may also be appropriate in some scenarios.

Indexed as

Research DesignRNAHumansLongitudinal StudiesSample SizeSequence Analysis, RNARNACorrelated dataMultiple DF testingRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID35643435
PMCPMC9148455
OpenAlexW4281807329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.