Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35643121›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2022

Dreaming during the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review.

Maurizio Gorgoni, Serena Scarpelli, Valentina Alfonsi, Luigi De Gennaro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maurizio GorgoniDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; Body and Action Lab, IRCSS Fondazione Santa Lucia, 00179 Rome, Italy. Electronic address: maurizio.gorgoni@uniroma1.it.
Serena ScarpelliDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy. Electronic address: serena.scarpelli@uniroma1.it.
Valentina AlfonsiDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy. Electronic address: valentina.alfonsi@uniroma1.it.
Luigi De GennaroDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; Body and Action Lab, IRCSS Fondazione Santa Lucia, 00179 Rome, Italy. Electronic address: luigi.degennaro@uniroma1.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to several influential models, dreams can be affected by state- and trait-like factors, sleep features, and diurnal experiences. The COVID-19 pandemic globally affected daily habits, emotional experiences, and sleep. Previous studies suggested an influence of collective traumatic events on dreaming. Starting from these premises, several studies assessed the effect of the pandemic on dreams. This paper aims to review findings concerning the oneiric activity during the COVID-19 pandemic. We report pandemic-related changes in dreams and nightmares, and we consider the possible factors associated with dreaming. Moreover, we provide results about changes in the oneiric activity in different phases of the pandemic. The reviewed findings suggest a pandemic-related enhancement of dream and nightmare frequency, emotional intensity, and distressing contents, modulated by modifications in restrictive measures and associated with diurnal experiences, emotional status, and sleep pattern. We highlight several methodological issues and a large heterogeneity in the present literature, limiting results' generalizability. However, we provide possible interpretations of the most consistent findings in light of the main theoretical frameworks about dreaming.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsDreamsEmotionsHumansSleepContinuity hypothesisCOVID-19DreamNightmarePandemic

Identifiers

PMID35643121
PMCPMC9132492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.