Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35642987›Full record

ReviewESMO open2022

The European Medicines Agency review of sacituzumab govitecan for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.

S Michaleas, A Moreno Oliver, J Mueller-Berghaus, S B Sarac, M E van der Elst, S Müller-Egert, H Zander, H Enzmann, F Pignatti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Clinical Implications ofPharmaceutics · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biomarkers in breast cancer 2024: an updated consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology and the Spanish Society of Pathology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Polypharmacology: promises and new drugs in 2022.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

S MichaleasOncology and Haematology Office, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: sotirios.michaleas@ema.europa.eu.
A Moreno OliverOncology and Haematology Office, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Mueller-BerghausPaul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
S B SaracDanish Medicines Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
M E van der ElstCollege ter Beoordeling van Geneesmiddelen, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee PRAC European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S Müller-EgertPaul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
H ZanderPaul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
H EnzmannBundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Bonn, Germany; Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
F PignattiOncology and Haematology Office, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
European Medicines Agency · NLPaul Ehrlich Institut · DEDanish Medicines Agency · DKFederal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an antineoplastic agent which combines a humanized monoclonal antibody binding to trophoblast cell surface antigen-2 (Trop-2)-expressing cancer cells, linked with cytotoxic moiety SN-38 (govitecan) with topoisomerase I inhibitor action. On 22 November 2021, a marketing authorization valid through the European Union (EU) was issued under the European Medicines Agency (EMA)'s accelerated assessment program for SG as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) who have received two or more prior systemic therapies, including at least one of them for advanced disease. The assessment was based on results from an open-label, randomized, phase III trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of SG versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with mTNBC who received at least two prior treatments including at least one of them for advanced disease. The efficacy results in the overall population, based on mature data, showed a statistically significant improvement of SG over TPC in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The median PFS was 4.8 months versus 1.7 months [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.43, n = 529; 95% CI 0.35-0.54; P < 0.0001] and the median OS was 11.8 months versus 6.9 months (HR = 0.51, n = 529; 95% CI 0.41-0.62; P < 0.0001). The most common (>30%) side effects of SG were diarrhea, neutropenia, nausea, fatigue, alopecia, anemia, constipation and vomiting. The aim of this manuscript is to summarize the scientific review of the application leading to regulatory approval in the EU.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsImmunoconjugatesTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCamptothecinHumansAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCamptothecinImmunoconjugatessacituzumab govitecanADCEMAsacituzumab govitecanTNBCTrop-2

Identifiers

PMID35642987
PMCPMC9149193
OpenAlexW4281569988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.