ReviewJournal of experimental botany2022
Phenotyping for waterlogging tolerance in crops: current trends and future prospects.
Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flooding stress resilience and crop improvement.Plant cell reports · 2026Review
- Distinct physiological and transcriptomic responses between tolerant and susceptible rapeseed (Brassica napus) germplasm to flooding stress.BMC genomic data · 2026Article
- Integrating natural variation through GWAS - genetics of drought and flood tolerance in grass pea reveal independent yet interconnected mechanisms.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Waterlogging and hypoxia in plant abiotic stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Waterlogging tolerance in pigeonpea: current understanding of physiological responses, genetic resources, and genomic prospects.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Transcriptional signatures associated with waterlogging stress responses and aerenchyma formation in barley root tissue.Annals of botany · 2025Article
- Optimizing Nitrogen Supplementation: Timing Strategies to Mitigate Waterlogging Stress in Winter- and Spring-Type Canola.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Between Two Extremes:Plant direct · 2025Article
- Decoding plant responses to waterlogging: from stress signals to molecular mechanisms and their future implications.Plant molecular biology · 2025Review
- Gaps and strategies for accurate simulation of waterlogging impacts on crop productivity.Nature food · 2025Review
- Mechanisms of plant acclimation to multiple abiotic stresses.Communications biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Physiological and image-based phenotyping assessment of waterlogging responses of three kiwifruit rootstocks and grafting combinations.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based approach for phenotypic trait extraction and computation of tomato under varying water stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Evaluating waterlogging stress response and recovery in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): an image-based phenotyping approach.Plant methods · 2024Article
- Adaptation of the Invasive PlantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Transcriptome and metabolome analyses reveal molecular insights into waterlogging tolerance in Barley.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Early-Stage Detection of Biotic and Abiotic Stress on Plants by Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging Analysis.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Transcriptional analysis in multiple barley varieties identifies signatures of waterlogging response.Plant direct · 2023Article
- Multi-Omics Pipeline and Omics-Integration Approach to Decipher Plant's Abiotic Stress Tolerance Responses.Genes · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Yield losses to waterlogging are expected to become an increasingly costly and frequent issue in some regions of the world. Despite the extensive work that has been carried out examining the molecular and physiological responses to waterlogging, phenotyping for waterlogging tolerance has proven difficult. This difficulty is largely due to the high variability of waterlogging conditions such as duration, temperature, soil type, and growth stage of the crop. In this review, we highlight use of phenotyping to assess and improve waterlogging tolerance in temperate crop species. We start by outlining the experimental methods that have been utilized to impose waterlogging stress, ranging from highly controlled conditions of hydroponic systems to large-scale screenings in the field. We also describe the phenotyping traits used to assess tolerance ranging from survival rates and visual scoring to precise photosynthetic measurements. Finally, we present an overview of the challenges faced in attempting to improve waterlogging tolerance, the trade-offs associated with phenotyping in controlled conditions, limitations of classic phenotyping methods, and future trends using plant-imaging methods. If effectively utilized to increase crop resilience to changing climates, crop phenotyping has a major role to play in global food security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.