Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35642503›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2022

Clinical Effectiveness of Telemedicine-Based Pediatric Genetics Care.

Katherine M Szigety, Terrence B Crowley, Kimberly B Gaiser, Erin Y Chen, Jessica R C Priestley, Lydia S Williams, Sneha A Rangu, Christina M Wright, Priyanka Adusumalli, Rebecca C Ahrens-Nicklas and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. "It's hard to wait": Provider perspectives on current genomic care in safety-net NICUs.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Katherine M SzigetyDivision of Human Genetics.
Terrence B CrowleyDivision of Human Genetics.
Kimberly B GaiserDivision of Human Genetics.
Erin Y ChenDivision of Human Genetics.
Jessica R C PriestleyDivision of Human Genetics.
Lydia S WilliamsDivision of Human Genetics.
Sneha A RanguDivision of Human Genetics.
Christina M WrightPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Priyanka AdusumalliDivision of Human Genetics.
Rebecca C Ahrens-NicklasDivision of Human Genetics.
Brandon CalderonDivision of Human Genetics.
Sanmati R CuddapahDivision of Human Genetics.
Andrew EdmondsonDivision of Human Genetics.
Can FiciciogluDivision of Human Genetics.
Rebecca GanetzkyDivision of Human Genetics.
Jennifer M KalishDivision of Human Genetics.
Ian D KrantzDivision of Human Genetics.
Donna M McDonald-McGinnDivision of Human Genetics.
Livija MedneDivision of Human Genetics.
Colleen MurareskuDivision of Human Genetics.
Louise C PyleDivision of Human Genetics.
Elaine H ZackaiDivision of Human Genetics.
Ian M Campbell *Division of Human Genetics.
Sarah E Sheppard *Division of Human Genetics.

Funding

Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Vascular MalformationsZIAHD009003 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI SHEPPARD, SARAH · 2022 to 2025
$6.1M
Mechanisms and Fetal Origins Underlying Gonadal Germ Cell Tumor-AWARDEDK08CA248704 · NCI · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PYLE, LOUISE CLARE · 2020 to 2024
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA248704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesTelemedicine may increase access to medical genetics care. However, in the pediatric setting, how telemedicine may affect the diagnostic rate is unknown, partially because of the perceived importance of the dysmorphology physical examination. We studied the clinical effectiveness of telemedicine for patients with suspected or confirmed genetic conditions.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of outpatient encounters before and after the widespread implementation of telemedicine (N = 5854). Visit types, diagnoses, patient demographic characteristics, and laboratory data were acquired from the electronic health record. Patient satisfaction was assessed through survey responses. New molecular diagnosis was the primary end point.

resultsPatients seen by telemedicine were more likely to report non-Hispanic White ancestry, prefer to speak English, live in zip codes with higher median incomes, and have commercial insurance (all P < .01). Genetic testing was recommended for more patients evaluated by telemedicine than in person (79.5% vs 70.9%; P < .001). Patients seen in person were more likely to have a sample collected, resulting in similar test completion rates (telemedicine, 51.2%; in person, 55.1%; P = .09). There was no significant difference in molecular diagnosis rate between visit modalities (telemedicine, 13.8%; in person, 12.4%; P = .40).

conclusionsTelemedicine and traditional in-person evaluation resulted in similar molecular diagnosis rates. However, improved methodologies for remote sample collection may be required. This study reveals the feasibility of telemedicine in a large academic medical genetics practice and is applicable to other pediatric specialties with perceived importance of physical examination.

Indexed as

TelemedicineChildHumansPatient SatisfactionRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35642503
PMCPMC9724118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.