Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35642470›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2022

Smooth or with a Snap! Biomechanics of Trap Reopening in the Venus Flytrap (Dionaea muscipula).

Grażyna M Durak, Rebecca Thierer, Renate Sachse, Manfred Bischoff, Thomas Speck, Simon Poppinga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Plant strategies against herbivorous insects.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biomechanics on Ultra-Sensitivity of Venus Flytrap's Micronewton Trigger Hairs.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The cracking of Scots pine (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  12. Shapeshifting in the Venus flytrap (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Grażyna M DurakBotanical Garden, Plant Biomechanics Group, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, 79085, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3960-7427
Rebecca ThiererInstitute for Structural Mechanics, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, 70550, Germany.
Renate SachseTUM School of Engineering and Design, Department of Engineering Physics and Computation, Technical University of Munich, Garching b. München, 85748, Germany.
Manfred BischoffInstitute for Structural Mechanics, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, 70550, Germany.
Thomas SpeckBotanical Garden, Plant Biomechanics Group, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, 79085, Germany.
Simon PoppingaBotanical Garden, Plant Biomechanics Group, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, 79085, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Stuttgart · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

Academic Research Alliance JONASBASF SEDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftMinistry of ScienceResearch and the Arts of the State of Baden-Württemberg
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fast snapping in the carnivorous Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) involves trap lobe bending and abrupt curvature inversion (snap-buckling), but how do these traps reopen? Here, the trap reopening mechanics in two different D. muscipula clones, producing normal-sized (N traps, max. ≈3 cm in length) and large traps (L traps, max. ≈4.5 cm in length) are investigated. Time-lapse experiments reveal that both N and L traps can reopen by smooth and continuous outward lobe bending, but only L traps can undergo smooth bending followed by a much faster snap-through of the lobes. Additionally, L traps can reopen asynchronously, with one of the lobes moving before the other. This study challenges the current consensus on trap reopening, which describes it as a slow, smooth process driven by hydraulics and cell growth and/or expansion. Based on the results gained via three-dimensional digital image correlation (3D-DIC), morphological and mechanical investigations, the differences in trap reopening are proposed to stem from a combination of size and slenderness of individual traps. This study elucidates trap reopening processes in the (in)famous Dionaea snap traps - unique shape-shifting structures of great interest for plant biomechanics, functional morphology, and applications in biomimetics, i.e., soft robotics.

Indexed as

DroseraceaeBiomechanical PhenomenaBiomimeticsBiophysicsCarnivorybiomechanicscarnivorous plantsmechanical instability problemsplant movementsnap-bucklingsnap-traps

Identifiers

PMID35642470
PMCPMC9353449
OpenAlexW4281762664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.