Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35642439›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical virology2022

Performance of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva in detecting Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Tina Uršič, Rok Kogoj, Jaka Šikonja, Damijana Roškarič, Monika Jevšnik Virant, Petra Bogovič, Miroslav Petrovec

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Molecular Diagnostic Testing (December 2023).Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. SARS-CoV-2 Variants May Affect Saliva RT-PCR Assay Sensitivity.The journal of applied laboratory medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prospective study of three saliva qualitative antigen testing kits for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 among mainly symptomatic patients in Japan.Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy · 2023
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Validation of RT-qPCR test for SARS-CoV-2 in saliva specimens.Journal of infection and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Role of population and test characteristics in antigen-based SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, Czechia, August to November 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tina UršičFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-5621-7167
Rok KogojFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-8999-4923
Jaka ŠikonjaFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-7843-8107
Damijana RoškaričFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Monika Jevšnik VirantFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-1754-8964
Petra BogovičDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Clinical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-2624-9691
Miroslav PetrovecFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-8498-7786
University of Ljubljana · SILjubljana University Medical Centre · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prospective cohort study was conducted during the Delta and Omicron severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic waves from paired nasopharyngeal swab (NPS or NP swab) and saliva samples taken from 624 participants. The study aimed to assess if any differences among participants from both waves could be observed and if any difference in molecular diagnostic performance could be observed among the two sample types. Samples were transported immediately to the laboratory to ensure the highest possible sample quality without any freezing and thawing steps before processing. Nucleic acids from saliva and NPS were prospectively extracted and SARS-CoV-2 was detected using a real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. All observed results were statistically analyzed. Although the results obtained with NP and saliva agreed overall, higher viral loads were observed in NP swabs regardless of the day of specimen collection in both SARS-CoV-2 epidemic waves. No significant difference could be observed between the two epidemic waves characterized by Delta or Omicron SARS-CoV-2. To note, Delta infection resulted in higher viral loads both in NP and saliva and more symptoms, including rhinorrhea, cough, and dyspnea, whereas Omicron wave patients more frequently reported sore throat. An increase in the mean log RNA of SARS-CoV-2 was observed with the number of expressed symptoms in both waves, however, the difference was not significant. Data confirmed that results from saliva were concordant with those from NP swabs, although saliva proved to be a challenging sample with frequent inhibitions that required substantial retesting.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HumansNasopharynxProspective StudiesSalivaSpecimen HandlingCOVID-19nasopharyngeal swabreal-time RT-PCRsalivaSARS-CoV-2 diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID35642439
PMCPMC9348014
OpenAlexW4281724393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.