Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35642362›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Surviving environmental change: when increasing population size can increase extinction risk.

Mark M Tanaka, Lindi M Wahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolutionary rescue on genotypic fitness landscapes.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark M TanakaUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2198-1402
Lindi M WahlWestern University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B7.ORCID 0000-0003-1163-0940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Populations threatened by an abrupt environmental change-due to rapid climate change, pathogens or invasive competitors-may survive if they possess or generate genetic combinations adapted to the novel, challenging condition. If these genotypes are initially rare or non-existent, the emergence of lineages that allow a declining population to survive is known as 'evolutionary rescue'. By contrast, the genotypes required for survival could, by chance, be common before the environmental change. Here, considering both of these possibilities, we find that the risk of extinction can be lower in very small or very large populations, but peaks at intermediate population sizes. This pattern occurs when the survival genotype has a small deleterious effect before the environmental change. Since mildly deleterious mutations constitute a large fraction of empirically measured fitness effects, we suggest that this unexpected result-an intermediate size that puts a population at a greater risk of extinction-may not be unusual in the face of environmental change.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBiological EvolutionClimate ChangeGenotypePopulation Densityevolutionary rescueextinctionmathematical modelstanding variation

Identifiers

PMID35642362
PMCPMC9156903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.