Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35642359›Full record

ReviewBJPsych open2022

The effects of neighbourhood social cohesion on preventing depression and anxiety among adolescents and young adults: rapid review.

Josefien J F Breedvelt, Henning Tiemeier, Evelyn Sharples, Sandro Galea, Claire Niedzwiedz, Iris Elliott, Claudi L Bockting

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJPsych open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Social cohesion, social capital and mental health: current evidence and future research directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impacts of Social Environments on Neighborhood Depression Incidence: Fully Accounting for Spatial Effects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Josefien J F BreedveltAcademic Medical Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Centre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and National Centre for Social Research, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1864-1861
Henning TiemeierMaternal and Child Center of Excellence, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Massachusetts, USA.
Evelyn SharplesIndependent Consultant, Barnardo's, UK.
Sandro GaleaBoston University School of Public Health, Massachusetts, USA.
Claire NiedzwiedzInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6133-4168
Iris ElliottDepartment of Policy and Research, Irish Human Rights & Equality Commission, Ireland.
Claudi L BocktingAcademic Medical Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Centre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R024774/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch suggests that increasing neighbourhood social cohesion can prevent mental health problems, including depression and anxiety. However, it is unknown whether this is the case for adolescents and young adults.

aimsTo investigate whether neighbourhood social cohesion can prevent depression and anxiety, and identify interventions that can increase neighbourhood cohesion in young people.

methodWe conducted a rapid review for an overview of the available literature. PubMed, Campbell Collaboration, KSR Ltd and grey literature databases were searched from inception up to 10 July 2020. When synthesising the results, we applied a hierarchy of evidence, prioritising study designs that allowed for the most ability to infer causality. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBIS tool and Joanna Briggs Institute risk-of-bias assessment. A narrative review and two workshops with young people were conducted to inform what future interventions may look like.

resultsForty-two peer-reviewed publications, including two systematic reviews, 13 longitudinal studies and 27 cross-sectional studies, were identified. Prospective longitudinal studies found that neighbourhood social cohesion factors (safety, trust, positive social connections, helping others and a lack of crime and violence) were associated with fewer depressive symptoms. Future interventions to increase neighbourhood cohesion should involve creating safe and attractive community centres, accessible and safe outdoor spaces, community activity groups and online communities.

conclusionsNeighbourhood social cohesion has the potential to protect mental health. The next step is to conduct intervention studies to evaluate the effects on onset prevention. Clinicians should consider the impact cohesion can have on mental health, and signpost to community initiatives.

Indexed as

Common mental health conditionscommunity preventionneighbourhoodspublic health

Identifiers

PMID35642359
PMCPMC9230698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.