Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35642305›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of cancer care2022

Intensive complex physical therapy combined with intermittent pneumatic compression versus Kinesio taping for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema of the upper limb: A randomised cross-over clinical trial.

Violeta Pajero Otero, Esther García Delgado, Concepción Martín Cortijo, María Luisa Rodríguez Ramos, Esperanza De Carlos Iriarte, Alejandra Gil García, Helena Romay-Barrero, Juan Avendaño-Coy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of cancer care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03051750 (Complex Physical Therapy Plus Pressotherapy Versus Kinesio Taping in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema. Randomized Crossover Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03051750 nacompletednot on this map

Complex Physical Therapy Plus Pressotherapy Versus Kinesio Taping in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema. Randomized Crossover Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorVioleta Pajero OteroRan2016 to 2016Enrolled43ConditionsBreast Cancer LymphedemaArmsComplex Physical Therapy plus Pressotherapy, Kinesio Taping
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Violeta Pajero OteroUniversity Hospital Infanta Sofía, San Sebastián de los Reyes, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2594-2809
Esther García DelgadoUniversity Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Concepción Martín CortijoUniversity Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
María Luisa Rodríguez RamosUniversity Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Esperanza De Carlos IriarteUnit of Breast Pathology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Alejandra Gil GarcíaUnit of Breast Pathology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Helena Romay-BarreroFaculty of Physical Therapy and Nursing, Castilla-La Mancha University, Toledo, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2388-2213
Juan Avendaño-CoyFaculty of Physical Therapy and Nursing, Castilla-La Mancha University, Toledo, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8760-3490
Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha · ES

Funding

Instituto de Investigación i+12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of complex physical therapy combined with intermittent pneumatic compression (CPT + IPC) versus Kinesio taping (KT) for breast cancer-related lymphedema.

methodsA cross-over clinical trial was conducted in 43 women with lymphedema. All participants received two interventions: CPT + IPC and KT, both lasting 3 weeks and a washout period. The main outcome variable was the relative volume change (RVC). The secondary variables were Satisfaction Questionnaire about Textile Therapeutic Devices used for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, motion range of upper limb and lymphedema-related symptoms.

resultsThe RVC reduction was greater with CPT + IPC (-2.2%, SD = 4.7) versus KT (-0.9%, SD = 1.7) (P = 0.002). KT was more satisfactory than multilayer bandaging (8.9 points difference, P < 0.001) and improved DASH score more than CPT + IPC (14.3 points difference, P = 0.002). Regarding motion ranges, only shoulder movements showed significant improvement with CPT + IPC compared with KT (differences between 5.6° and 11.4°). Of the symptoms assessed, only pain reduction showed a significant improvement with KT versus CPT + IPC (0.5 points, P = 0.035).

conclusionsCPT + IPC achieved higher RVC and greater improvement in th shoulder motion range than KT. Conversely, KT was more satisfactory than multilayer bandaging, obtained better DASH scores and relieved pain more than CPT + IPC. CLINICAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial registration number: NCT03051750 (date of registration 14 February 2017).

Indexed as

Breast Cancer LymphedemaBreast NeoplasmsLymphedemaFemaleHumansIntermittent Pneumatic Compression DevicesPainPhysical Therapy ModalitiesTreatment OutcomeUpper Extremitycomplex physical therapyintermittent pneumatic compressionKinesio tapinglymphedemarelative volume changesatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID35642305
PMCPMC9540766
OpenAlexW4281756588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.