Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35642231›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2022

Ozone Therapy for Dermatological Conditions: A Systematic Review.

Débora Aparecida Oliveira Modena, Rafael de Castro Ferreira, Patricia Meyer Froes, Katya Cristina Rocha

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Low ozone concentrations promoteEuropean journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Use of Ozone Therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Débora Aparecida Oliveira ModenaDr. Oliveira Modena is with the Department of Surgery, Medical Sciences Institute, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil and the Departamento de Medicina Celular e Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, São Paulo, Brasil.
Rafael de Castro FerreiraMr. de Castro Ferreira is with the Departamento de Medicina Celular e Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, São Paulo, Brasil.
Patricia Meyer FroesDr. Froes is with the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil.
Katya Cristina RochaDr. Rocha is with the Departamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, São Paulo, Brasil.
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Known in the past for its toxic aspect as the main urban pollutant, in the last few decades, ozone has been gaining greater visibility for its possible antimicrobial, antiviral, and antioxidant effects when used in human dermatological pathologies. Despite the reports of clinical benefits, the standard dosage for clinical efficacy and safety are yet not clear, nor are its means of application and its true acting mechanism. Objective: We conducted a review to determine the efficacy and safety of ozone therapy for a variety of dermatological conditions. Methods: We considered clinical trials (both randomized and non-randomized) published between December 2020 and March 2021 as long as they provided some PICO information, i.e., population (P), intervention (I), and study design. The skin dermatological conditions researched were: acne, dermatitis, psoriasis, systemic sclerosis, herpes, aging, ulcers, and skin scarring. Results: A total of 326 articles were identified and 150 remained after duplicates were removed. After titles, abstracts and full articles were read, 17 articles were included in the systematic review (with 643 patients). Conclusion: Ozone therapy seems promising for some dermatological conditions; however, the articles included in this review had methodological limitations and did not sufficiently demonstrate sound evidence for safe therapy. Therefore, more studies with better methodological standards and longer-term assessments of side effects should be conducted to achieve better standards and safety in ozone therapy for dermatological conditions.

Indexed as

dermatological affectionsdermatological pathologiesozoneozone therapy

Identifiers

PMID35642231
PMCPMC9122276
OpenAlexW4282914845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.