ArticleIFAC-PapersOnLine2021
Model Segmentation in Single Particle Tracking.
Article in IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review of Machine Learning for Single-Particle Tracking: Methods, Challenges, and Biophysical Insights.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we implement and compare two different change detection techniques applied to determining the time points in Single Particle Tracking (SPT) data where the particle changes the dynamic model of motion. The goal is to use this change detection to segment the data in order to estimate the relevant parameters of such models. We consider two well-known statistics commonly used for change detection: the likelihood ratio test (LRT) and the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD). We assume that our time-varying system is subject to step-like changes in the parameters that drive the process. The techniques are then applied to experimental data acquired on a microscope under controlled settings to validate our results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.